- From: jan-ivar via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 01:53:19 +0000
- To: public-media-capture-logs@w3.org
@miguelao Isn't there also `exposureMode`, `iso`, `focusMode`, and `fillLightMode` from your [list](https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-image/issues/124#issuecomment-268318169)? I don't have a concrete proposal, merely challenging what is most logical: * Separate video and photo settings is more logical, less convenient. * Single mechanism for settings is more convenient, less logical. If we chose the former, any ranges for values of `takePhoto` arguments would not belong in `getCapabilities`, and would need their own thing IMHO, e.g. `getPhotoCapabilities()`. >e.g. imageWidth might support any value between 400px and 4000px in steps of 100px In a vacuum where constraints didn't exist, I'd say the most logical way to represent "delayed" (photo) settings would be an array of values for each thing, and then have `takePhoto` fail if called with values not in the array. No need for a separate "configuring" step, since you know all the valid settings. You're not configuring the device, you're configuring the shot. If we chose the latter, for "delayed" (photo) properties which never collide, the `exact` keyword seems to exist solely to compensate for the lack of specificity in `getCapabilities()`. I'm curious, how do we imagine a user "configuring" their device in the single constraints model? What would the UI look like? How would the app learn the discrete settings to offer as choices? * Call `applyConstraints({imageWidth: {exact: w}, imageHeight: {exact: h}})` until it succeeds? * Call `applyConstraints({imageWidth: {min: minWidthICanAccept, max: maxWidthICanAccept}, imageHeight: {min: minHeightICanAccept, max: maxHeightICanAccept}})` and hope it doesn't fail? What's the ideal UI here? Maybe we should start there. -- GitHub Notification of comment by jan-ivar Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-image/pull/146#issuecomment-283531631 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 2 March 2017 01:53:26 UTC