- From: jan-ivar via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 17:05:53 +0000
- To: public-media-capture-logs@w3.org
To clarify where I stand now, I won't argue strongly against a scaling feature - as somewhat of a complement to `canvasCapture` driving creation of frames - other than to say I'm confident we'll come up with something better if we address offline recording first. I see two kinds of offline recording: The first is recording frames faster than playback, typically as fast as possible. The second is frame generation from some time-consuming effort, whether it be timelapse or rendering some scene. In the second case, what if the time it takes to generate each frame varies? For that reason, I suspect @pehrsons [is on to something](https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-record/pull/114#issuecomment-275482542) when he talks about per-frame control. But I don't think we'll know what that that looks like until we've discussed offline recording. -- GitHub Notification of comment by jan-ivar Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-record/pull/114#issuecomment-277017937 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 2 February 2017 17:09:20 UTC