W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture-logs@w3.org > September 2016

Re: [mediacapture-main] Wording concern about the text describing the add track and remove track algorithms

From: Adam Bergkvist via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 12:53:28 +0000
To: public-media-capture-logs@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-246671462-1473771206-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Thanks @a2sheppy for reviewing this text carefully.

Your interpretation that the two first algorithms are intended for 
when a script adds or removes a track is not entirely correct in all 
cases. These algorithms are just sets of tasks with no given context. 
It's true that the addTrack() function and the MediaStream() 
constructor use the 'add a track' steps, but so does the algorithm 
below (step 2) where the context is a track being added by some event 
initiated by the User Agent (and not the script). So it's the caller 
that sets the context.

One option to make the situation clearer would be to remove the 'add a
 track' and 'remove a track' altogether and inline the two steps that 
actually do something in the callers algorithms. It would be less 
jumping around when reading the text with the only drawback that if we
 would like to add more steps, we would have to do that in several 
locations. But that's not very likely and I believe that we ended up 
with fewer steps in these algorithms than we expected to begin with. 
We would also get rid of the strange step "If the operation in the 
previous step was aborted prematurely, then abort these steps." which 
is used by the two 'Initiated by UA' algorithms.

`"A new MediaStreamTrack has been added to this stream. Note that this
 event is not fired when the script directly modifies the tracks of a 
MediaStream ."`

Is the below better?

`"A new MediaStreamTrack has been added to this stream. Note that this
 event is not fired when the script modifies the tracks of a 
MediaStream via some API call."`

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by adam-be
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-main/issues/388#issuecomment-246671462
 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 13 September 2016 12:53:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:27:30 UTC