- From: Daniel Burnett via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 15:43:59 +0000
- To: public-media-capture-logs@w3.org
Regarding getConstraints and the constraints given to gUM and applyConstraints(), I could use help from @jan-ivar . The issue is figuring out how to be precise about what "semantic equivalence" would mean for different JavaScript objects passed in as arguments and returned from getConstraints(). In trying to write a PR for this I have been unable to find any approach that does not involve trying to enumerate equivalences not only of bare and ideal but also the various ways that objects can be equivalent. Specifying the bare/ideal and any other constraint-mechanism-specific equivalences is fine, but I don't want to have to try to precisely enumerate equivalences among JavaScript objects that map to to the same WebIDL structure. Any thoughts, Jan-Ivar? -- GitHub Notification of comment by burnburn Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-main/issues/360#issuecomment-245641165 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 8 September 2016 15:44:11 UTC