- From: jan-ivar via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 16:35:10 +0000
- To: public-media-capture-logs@w3.org
jan-ivar has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-main: == Clarify behavior of using wrong-type constraints == The following programming error is not a `TypeError` in our spec: ```js if (navigator.mediaDevices.getSupportedConstraints().width) { let stream = await navigator.mediaDevices.getUserMedia({audio: {width: 640}}); // audio } ``` My best reading of the current spec is that it should be silently ignored, which seems defensible given how dictionary members tend to work ("ignore unrelated members"), so that's not my question. My question is, should the following reject with `OverconstrainedError`? ```js if (navigator.mediaDevices.getSupportedConstraints().width) { let stream = await navigator.mediaDevices.getUserMedia({audio: {width: {exact: 640}}}); } ``` It seems to hinge on reading this language: * *"If the constraint is required ('min', 'max', or 'exact'), and the [settings dictionary](https://w3c.github.io/mediacapture-main/getusermedia.html#dfn-settings-dictionary)'s value for the constraint does not satisfy the constraint, the fitness distance is positive infinity."* "Satisfy" does not appear defined anywhere. Specifically, it doesn't say how to handle when a settings-dictionary does not have a value for the constraint, i.e. the constraint is irrelevant. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-main/issues/409 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 10 October 2016 16:35:19 UTC