Adam Bergkvist via GitHub
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Add contribution guidelines (based on webrtc-pc version) (Thursday, 28 January)
- [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by adam-be (Thursday, 28 January)
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Specify permission model for nested browsing contexts (fixes: #267) (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] How to handle known but unsupported constraints (Wednesday, 27 January)
- [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by adam-be (Monday, 25 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Add text about Capabilities and features that can only in mode 'off' (issue: #296) (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] How to handle known but unsupported constraints (Thursday, 21 January)
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Add text about Capabilities and features that can only in mode 'off' (issue: #296) (Thursday, 21 January)
- [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by adam-be (Thursday, 14 January)
- Closed: [mediacapture-main] Is there any sense in having defaults for SupportedCapabilities? (Thursday, 14 January)
- [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by adam-be (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] on{add,remove}track event description inconsistency (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Dealing with LC-3019 "WebIDL compilability in template" (Friday, 8 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Is there any sense in having defaults for SupportedCapabilities? (Thursday, 7 January)
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: getSupportedConstraints(): Remove prose about dictionary member default values (fixes: #293) (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Is there any sense in having defaults for SupportedCapabilities? (Thursday, 7 January)
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Remove default values from MediaTrackSupportedConstraints (fixes: #293) (Tuesday, 5 January)
- [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by adam-be (Monday, 4 January)
- [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by adam-be (Monday, 4 January)
Andreas Pehrson via GitHub
Daniel Burnett via GitHub
Dominique Hazael-Massieux via GitHub
Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Dealing with LC-3019 "WebIDL compilability in template" (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Iframe sandboxing options for gUM (Thursday, 28 January)
- Closed: [mediacapture-main] track.applyConstraints() doesn't do anything. (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] track.applyConstraints() doesn't do anything. (Thursday, 28 January)
- [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by alvestrand (Thursday, 28 January)
- Closed: [mediacapture-main] Permission model for cross-origin iframes (Thursday, 28 January)
- [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by alvestrand (Thursday, 28 January)
- [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by alvestrand (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] How to handle known but unsupported constraints (Thursday, 28 January)
- Closed: [mediacapture-main] Consider merging ErrorEvent definition with Media Stream Recording (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Consider merging ErrorEvent definition with Media Stream Recording (Wednesday, 20 January)
- [mediacapture-main] Use permissions API model for describing permissions? (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Consider merging ErrorEvent definition with Media Stream Recording (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] How to handle known but unsupported constraints (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Permission model for cross-origin iframes (Thursday, 7 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] track.applyConstraints() doesn't do anything. (Thursday, 7 January)
- Closed: [mediacapture-main] Unclear how to associate current active device with enumerated devices (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Unclear how to associate current active device with enumerated devices (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Unclear how to associate current active device with enumerated devices (Tuesday, 5 January)
Iñaki Baz Castillo via GitHub
jan-ivar via GitHub
- Re: [mediacapture-main] How to handle known but unsupported constraints (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] How to handle known but unsupported constraints (Thursday, 28 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Clarify how the generic applyConstraints algorithm applies to MSTs (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] How to handle known but unsupported constraints (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load (Saturday, 23 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load (Saturday, 23 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load (Saturday, 23 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] How to handle known but unsupported constraints (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Unclear how to associate current active device with enumerated devices (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Is there any sense in having defaults for SupportedCapabilities? (Tuesday, 5 January)
jnoring via GitHub
- Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load (Saturday, 23 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load (Saturday, 23 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load (Friday, 22 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load (Wednesday, 13 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] getUserMedia: spec does not define what happens when browser gUM dialog disappears completely (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load (Monday, 11 January)
- [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load (Monday, 11 January)
- [mediacapture-main] getUserMedia: spec does not define what happens when browser gUM dialog disappears completely (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Unclear how to associate current active device with enumerated devices (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Unclear how to associate current active device with enumerated devices (Tuesday, 5 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Unclear how to associate current active device with enumerated devices (Tuesday, 5 January)
- [mediacapture-main] Unclear how to associate current active device with enumerated devices (Monday, 4 January)
KOLANICH via GitHub
Martin Thomson via GitHub
Mathieu Hofman via GitHub
Miguel Casas-Sanchez via GitHub
stefan hakansson via GitHub
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Clarify how the generic applyConstraints algorithm applies to MSTs (Thursday, 28 January)
- Closed: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load (Wednesday, 27 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] track.applyConstraints() doesn't do anything. (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load (Thursday, 21 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Closed: [mediacapture-main] getUserMedia: spec does not define what happens when browser gUM dialog disappears completely (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] getUserMedia: spec does not define what happens when browser gUM dialog disappears completely (Wednesday, 20 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load (Tuesday, 19 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] getUserMedia: spec does not define what happens when browser gUM dialog disappears completely (Tuesday, 19 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] on{add,remove}track event description inconsistency (Tuesday, 12 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] on{add,remove}track event description inconsistency (Monday, 11 January)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Explain how extensions are to be done (Thursday, 7 January)
Last message date: Sunday, 31 January 2016 22:52:20 UTC