public-media-capture-logs@w3.org from January 2016 by date

Sunday, 31 January 2016

• Re: [mediacapture-main] Replace device enumeration API with API returning a secure widget Iñaki Baz Castillo via GitHub
• [mediacapture-main] Replace device enumeration API with a secure widget KOLANICH via GitHub

Thursday, 28 January 2016

• Re: [mediacapture-main] Dealing with LC-3019 "WebIDL compilability in template" Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Iframe sandboxing options for gUM Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• Closed: [mediacapture-main] track.applyConstraints() doesn't do anything. Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] track.applyConstraints() doesn't do anything. Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by alvestrand Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• Closed: [mediacapture-main] Permission model for cross-origin iframes Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by alvestrand Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by alvestrand Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Clarify how the generic applyConstraints algorithm applies to MSTs Daniel Burnett via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] How to handle known but unsupported constraints jan-ivar via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] How to handle known but unsupported constraints jan-ivar via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] How to handle known but unsupported constraints Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Add contribution guidelines (based on webrtc-pc version) Adam Bergkvist via GitHub
• [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by adam-be Adam Bergkvist via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Specify permission model for nested browsing contexts (fixes: #267) Dominique Hazael-Massieux via GitHub
• [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Specify permission model for nested browsing contexts (fixes: #267) Adam Bergkvist via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Clarify how the generic applyConstraints algorithm applies to MSTs stefan hakansson via GitHub

Wednesday, 27 January 2016

• Re: [mediacapture-main] Clarify how the generic applyConstraints algorithm applies to MSTs jan-ivar via GitHub
• [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Clarify how the generic applyConstraints algorithm applies to MSTs Daniel Burnett via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] How to handle known but unsupported constraints jan-ivar via GitHub
• [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom Dominique Hazael-Massieux via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] How to handle known but unsupported constraints Adam Bergkvist via GitHub
• Closed: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load stefan hakansson via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load stefan hakansson via GitHub

Tuesday, 26 January 2016

• Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load Mathieu Hofman via GitHub

Monday, 25 January 2016

• [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by adam-be Adam Bergkvist via GitHub

Saturday, 23 January 2016

• Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load jan-ivar via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load jan-ivar via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load jnoring via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load jan-ivar via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load jnoring via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load Mathieu Hofman via GitHub

Friday, 22 January 2016

• Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load jnoring via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load Mathieu Hofman via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load jnoring via GitHub

Thursday, 21 January 2016

• Re: [mediacapture-main] How to handle known but unsupported constraints jan-ivar via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Add text about Capabilities and features that can only in mode 'off' (issue: #296) Adam Bergkvist via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] How to handle known but unsupported constraints Adam Bergkvist via GitHub
• [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Add text about Capabilities and features that can only in mode 'off' (issue: #296) Adam Bergkvist via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] track.applyConstraints() doesn't do anything. stefan hakansson via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load stefan hakansson via GitHub
• [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Explain WebIDL limitation for ConstrainablePattern Daniel Burnett via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load Martin Thomson via GitHub

Wednesday, 20 January 2016

• Closed: [mediacapture-main] Consider merging ErrorEvent definition with Media Stream Recording Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Consider merging ErrorEvent definition with Media Stream Recording Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• [mediacapture-main] Use permissions API model for describing permissions? Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load stefan hakansson via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load Martin Thomson via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load stefan hakansson via GitHub
• Closed: [mediacapture-main] getUserMedia: spec does not define what happens when browser gUM dialog disappears completely stefan hakansson via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] getUserMedia: spec does not define what happens when browser gUM dialog disappears completely stefan hakansson via GitHub

Tuesday, 19 January 2016

• Re: [mediacapture-main] getUserMedia: spec does not define what happens when browser gUM dialog disappears completely Mathieu Hofman via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load stefan hakansson via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] getUserMedia: spec does not define what happens when browser gUM dialog disappears completely stefan hakansson via GitHub

Thursday, 14 January 2016

• [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by adam-be Adam Bergkvist via GitHub
• Closed: [mediacapture-main] Is there any sense in having defaults for SupportedCapabilities? Adam Bergkvist via GitHub

Wednesday, 13 January 2016

• Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load jnoring via GitHub
• [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by adam-be Adam Bergkvist via GitHub

Tuesday, 12 January 2016

• Closed: [mediacapture-main] on{add, remove}track event description inconsistency Miguel Casas-Sanchez via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] on{add,remove}track event description inconsistency Miguel Casas-Sanchez via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Consider merging ErrorEvent definition with Media Stream Recording Miguel Casas-Sanchez via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] getUserMedia: spec does not define what happens when browser gUM dialog disappears completely Mathieu Hofman via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load Mathieu Hofman via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load jnoring via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] getUserMedia: spec does not define what happens when browser gUM dialog disappears completely jnoring via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] on{add,remove}track event description inconsistency stefan hakansson via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] on{add,remove}track event description inconsistency Adam Bergkvist via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] getUserMedia: spec does not define what happens when browser gUM dialog disappears completely Andreas Pehrson via GitHub

Monday, 11 January 2016

• Re: [mediacapture-main] on{add,remove}track event description inconsistency stefan hakansson via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load jnoring via GitHub
• [mediacapture-main] gUM firing repeatedly for the same page load jnoring via GitHub
• [mediacapture-main] getUserMedia: spec does not define what happens when browser gUM dialog disappears completely jnoring via GitHub
• [mediacapture-main] on{add,remove}track event description inconsistency Miguel Casas-Sanchez via GitHub

Friday, 8 January 2016

• Re: [mediacapture-main] Dealing with LC-3019 "WebIDL compilability in template" Adam Bergkvist via GitHub

Thursday, 7 January 2016

• Re: [mediacapture-main] Consider merging ErrorEvent definition with Media Stream Recording Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] How to handle known but unsupported constraints Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Permission model for cross-origin iframes Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] track.applyConstraints() doesn't do anything. Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• Closed: [mediacapture-main] Explain how extensions are to be done Daniel Burnett via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Explain how extensions are to be done Daniel Burnett via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Is there any sense in having defaults for SupportedCapabilities? Adam Bergkvist via GitHub
• [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: getSupportedConstraints(): Remove prose about dictionary member default values (fixes: #293) Adam Bergkvist via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Explain how extensions are to be done stefan hakansson via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Is there any sense in having defaults for SupportedCapabilities? Adam Bergkvist via GitHub

Tuesday, 5 January 2016

• Re: [mediacapture-main] Unclear how to associate current active device with enumerated devices jan-ivar via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Unclear how to associate current active device with enumerated devices jnoring via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Is there any sense in having defaults for SupportedCapabilities? jan-ivar via GitHub
• Closed: [mediacapture-main] Unclear how to associate current active device with enumerated devices Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Unclear how to associate current active device with enumerated devices Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Unclear how to associate current active device with enumerated devices jnoring via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Unclear how to associate current active device with enumerated devices jnoring via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Unclear how to associate current active device with enumerated devices Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Remove default values from MediaTrackSupportedConstraints (fixes: #293) Adam Bergkvist via GitHub
• Re: [mediacapture-main] Unclear how to associate current active device with enumerated devices Mathieu Hofman via GitHub

Monday, 4 January 2016

• [mediacapture-main] Unclear how to associate current active device with enumerated devices jnoring via GitHub
• [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by adam-be Adam Bergkvist via GitHub
• [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by adam-be Adam Bergkvist via GitHub

Last message date: Sunday, 31 January 2016 22:52:20 UTC