Re: [mediacapture-main] WebIDL types needed in Constrainable application

(@dontcallmedom asked me to move this comment here)

I hate to say it but, since the method is called 
getSupportedConstraints rather than getSupportedCapabilities (which I 
voted for!) or getSupportedSettings, returning a 
MediaTrackConstraintSet might have a slight advantage in my mind. On a
 technical note, choosing that would also let us conveniently return 
truthy values like this:

    { width: {}, height: {}, frameRate: {}, facingMode: {} ...  }

without getting into what the types involved are. That's perhaps a 
minor issue though, so maybe we'll just keep this in mind as we 
develop whichever PR we go for.

-- 
GitHub Notif of comment by jan-ivar
See 
https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-main/issues/116#issuecomment-78099022

Received on Tuesday, 10 March 2015 17:03:54 UTC