W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture-logs@w3.org > June 2015

Re: [mediacapture-main] Referring to html5.1 for describing srcObject in media elements.

From: Harald Alvestrand via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 13:16:29 +0000
To: public-media-capture-logs@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-114496130-1435065387-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
On 06/23/2015 02:45 PM, stefan hakansson wrote:
>
> I've now updated the PR to the best of my knowledge. Some comments:
>
>   * readyState and networkState is pretty well defined in html5.1, 
so
>     I've removed those from the table. However, this will mean a
>     change in behavior since during the load/resFetch/resFetch 
process
>     networkState will toggle (idle, noSource, netwLoading, idle) and
>     not constantly stay at idle. Also, for networkState the state
>     "HaveMetadate" will be gone through. List discussion on this 
part?
>
I think this is not a problem. The difference will be apparent only to
 
people who watch these transitions.

>   * there is no text about live track lists and so on, I find that
>     pretty clear in html51
>   * also no text about what happens if the MediaStream is inactive
>     when assigned as srcObject; I find that too being clear in 
html51
>   * I have added text saying that if a MediaStream goes from active 
to
>     inactive the ended event should fire from the MediaElement and 
so
>     on. Questionable if this really adds anything of value though -
>     the app interested could just as well listen to MediaStream 
events.
>
I think this has value if (for example) one is using a "player" 
library 
that creates controls and so on for the media element, and which 
doesn't 
know anything about mediastreams. Not sure how important this is.
>
> An open question is if we should ask the html people to add 
> clarifications related to buffered, playoutRate etc. to cover "live"
 
> media (so we could remove those parts).
>

I am fine with not bothering them :-)
>
> Assigning to Adam for a second round of reviews.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub 
> 
<https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-main/pull/171#issuecomment-114482492>.
>



-- 
GitHub Notif of comment by alvestrand
See 
https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-main/pull/171#issuecomment-114496130
Received on Tuesday, 23 June 2015 13:16:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:27:26 UTC