W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture-logs@w3.org > December 2015

Re: [mediacapture-main] Iframe sandboxing options for gUM

From: Adam Bergkvist via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 10:52:55 +0000
To: public-media-capture-logs@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-161597046-1449139971-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Taking the rest of @dontcallmedom's input into consideration; 
especially (correct me if I've got this wrong Dom):

* Add creators don't want to have their ads in sandboxed iframes (a 
problem for the site owner since the advertisers won't pay for premium
 in this case [1])
* User media default on means that ads (in iframes) on existing pages,
 that aren't updated with restrictions, can start using it in the 
future

I think we're best of with ```<iframe allowusermedia>``` (= default 
off)

[1] 
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webappsec/2015Feb/thread.html#msg225

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by adam-be
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-main/issues/268#issuecomment-161597046
 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 3 December 2015 10:52:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:27:28 UTC