- From: None via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 21:24:13 +0000
- To: public-media-capture-logs@w3.org
@fluffy You get an error, and then what? Wait? I think you want a lower-res mode that can sustain 100 fps even in low light that wont fail on you. What I'm trying to say is it'll likely come down to a choice between a high-res mode that can do sunny-day 100 fps, and a lower-res one that can do 100 fps sustained even in low light. An important decision. My problem with what Harald proposes is it *leaves no way to distinguish between these two modes* (*), which means you'll always get the former and never the latter. You wont even know the second mode exists / is better fps-wise. That seems bad. *) Unless one goes slumming for lower-resolution modes, in hopes they'll fare better on fps, a terrible API. -- GitHub Notif of comment by jan-ivar See https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-main/issues/193#issuecomment-135558329
Received on Thursday, 27 August 2015 21:24:14 UTC