- From: Rimell, Phil <phil.rimell@refinitiv.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 16:19:15 +0000
- To: "public-md-odrl-profile@w3.org" <public-md-odrl-profile@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <3A702EDA-553B-4A9D-B538-38B300047EAB@refinitiv.com>
Please find the minutes of today’s meeting at https://www.w3.org/2020/06/24-md-odrl-profile-minutes.html and pasted below. Summary of Resolutions 1. terms to be added to standard<https://www.w3.org/2020/06/24-md-odrl-profile-minutes.html#resolution01> 2. terms for source and resource and asset to be added to standard<https://www.w3.org/2020/06/24-md-odrl-profile-minutes.html#resolution02> Best regards, Phil Rights Automation Community Group 24 Jun 2020 Agenda<https://w3c.github.io/market-data-odrl-profile/agendas/md-odrl-profile-agenda-2020-06-24.html> Attendees Present Mark, Ben, Graham, Josh, Laura, Natassa, Mark_D, Ilya, Michelle, Atiq, Michael, Elizabeth, Aaron, Stephen Regrets jo, Renato Chair Ben Scribe Phil Contents * Topics<https://www.w3.org/2020/06/24-md-odrl-profile-minutes.html#agenda> * Admin<https://www.w3.org/2020/06/24-md-odrl-profile-minutes.html#item01> * review of recent webinar<https://www.w3.org/2020/06/24-md-odrl-profile-minutes.html#item02> * Editors’ Update<https://www.w3.org/2020/06/24-md-odrl-profile-minutes.html#item03> * Any Other Business<https://www.w3.org/2020/06/24-md-odrl-profile-minutes.html#item04> * Summary of Action Items<https://www.w3.org/2020/06/24-md-odrl-profile-minutes.html#ActionSummary> * Summary of Resolutions<https://www.w3.org/2020/06/24-md-odrl-profile-minutes.html#ResolutionSummary> ________________________________ <benws> https://www.w3.org/2020/06/10-md-odrl-profile-minutes.html <Natasa> Overview of the webinar <scribe> meeting: Rights Automation Community Group Teleconference <scribe> chair: Ben <scribe> scribe: Phil Admin https://www.w3.org/2020/06/10-md-odrl-profile-minutes.html review of recent webinar Mark: described webinar and the poll results Ben: warm welcome to new members of the group Editors’ Update Ben: good activity on the github group ... roles in the supply chain is first area being modelled ... we have originators ... then we have providers, dont generate but do distribute resources ... then we have distributors who are assignees of rights ... then we have service facilitators, not part of the exchange of rights in the supply chain ... organisations typically play multiple roles Mark: introduced new part in the supply chain ... we cant assume creator always administers the rights ... some creators will contract this out to a third party ... so mark proposes the term "administrator" Ben: is the administrator involved in distribution? Mark: sometimes yes and sometimes no Ben: can we distinguish between those roles? Mark: sounds right ... interesting that the originator is at the top of the supply chain, and assigns the role to another Michael: raised some questions around this Steven: ceratin firms do licence on behalf of exchanges, idea of administrator could work Mark: asked about tech distribution of CME data Michael: CME uses S&P and DME for distribution Graham V: in previous standard we had role of licensing "agent" Ben: sounds like the "administrator" Mark: agree Ben: suggest we resolve to add terms to standard, asks for objections RESOLUTION: terms to be added to standard Ben: assets, sources and resources is the next set of definitions ... ODRL defines an asset ... allows us to segment resource using rules ... we have a use case where and asset become a resource and it moves down the supply chain ... therefore we want a source to be a root resource, the original origin of the data Phil: i agree that source, resource and asset works as described for refinitiv Ben: in answering a question about when a resource changes ... we are trying to capture a number of transformations that do not change the resource ... if we comingle two resources under two rules, then control over the combination is a combined rule Mark D: re tick history, we have a licence from a provider to capture tick history, but provider said it was their property scribe: we have to deal with provider and originator Ilya: this is a bit different from a derived product, a combination of orinator and deriver's rights Ben: What we are definitely trying to model is where a new licence is created, but where it must be compliant with rights received from originator ... we want compliance checks to be automatic ... including where it's derived Ilya: an exchange may have an embargo period, but the transit provider may want to apply additional restrictions Ben: yes that needs to factored in Atiq: two use case ... redistribution ... derivation ... consider firstly versioning of restrictions we need to work out ... second two independant sources means unique identity needs to be resolved Ben: yes, two complex points ... please could Atiq create an issue on github for the versioning ... either need some provenance or create a new licence that will always satisfy the original licences before comingling Atiq: i think there's a debate to be had between those two approaces to the combining issue Ben: asks Atiq to create an issue on github for this one too RESOLUTION: terms for source and resource and asset to be added to standard Ben: next issue is #5 on github ... derivation of new original works, provider want to control how derived works are used ... want to restrict consumer rights ... provider can put a duty in to control redistribution or derivation ... when a consumer writes a policy they are under a duty to check compliance from original provider ... it's a "subsumption" check ... in this way we can control using "next policy" construct down the supply chain ... asks Mark for view on this, needed? meets use cases? Mark: yes, needed. ... typically this is done using a general set of policies, augmented by a specific set of policies ... the specific licensing agreement means the provider controls downstream Ben: does the CME put this in the lliceces? Mark: some cases yes, other cases needs a new specific licence on request Michelle: where index or other financial product where does this fit in? Ben: seen examples where derivations can be allowed but with refinements that prohibit certain actions Stephen: CME typically have a direct licence for rights to derive with refinements and limitations in a number of areas, i.e. index can be used on certain platforms only ... sometimes derived is governed just as distribution, sometime very specific to the thing derived Ben: we will explore this over coming weeks and see if we can capture where derivations vs just distribution ... terms around duties will be discussed in the next session Any Other Business Ben: none, thanks everyone Summary of Action Items Summary of Resolutions 1. terms to be added to standard<https://www.w3.org/2020/06/24-md-odrl-profile-minutes.html#resolution01> 2. terms for source and resource and asset to be added to standard<https://www.w3.org/2020/06/24-md-odrl-profile-minutes.html#resolution02> [End of minutes]
Received on Wednesday, 24 June 2020 16:19:35 UTC