- From: Gerrit Meixner <Gerrit.Meixner@dfki.de>
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 13:26:13 +0100
- To: <public-mbui@w3.org>
Dear colleague, after our last telco I took some time to think about the current situation in our working group and the current draft documents. In the last telco several members (e.g., Joelle, Gaelle, Fabio) expressed that they could not fully follow the current discussions concerning the meta-model for the AUI specification. Therefore I started a discussion with Fabio (as co-chair) and Dave (as W3C contact) at the end of last week. Here're our thoughts. We think that we're running too much into scientific discussions with only little practical relevance. In the last telco we had in-depth scientific discussions concerning the AUI meta-model. It seems to be that the AUI meta-model is now getting too complex rather than to be easily useful for industrial companies. We have to distinguish between scientific work and work for practical standardization. It would be better to have a clean AUI meta-model, understandable, focused on the AUI concepts, without introducing too many additional things related to other models or issues. Furthermore the goal of our charter is to develop a standard that can be readily exploited by industry for interchange of UI designs between different editing tools (http://www.w3.org/2011/01/mbui-wg-charter). An overly complex meta-model may harm the realization of that goal and we would rather start from a simpler core set of features and allow for future extensions in response to industry need rather than second guessing what those might be. To draw a conclusion I would suggest to try to publish a first les complex AUI meta-model which could be easily used in industry. An extended version could then be published in future. The current AUI specification must not be perfect, but we have to remember the target audience of the specification: practitioners in industry. Perhaps the way forward is to see if we can prioritize the features and try to get a feel for which ones are core and which ones have only marginal interest? Would it even be worth thinking about how we could reach out to industry via a survey of some kind? I would be happy to get your opinions. Thanks. Best regards Gerrit ======================== Dr.-Ing. Gerrit Meixner Head of the Human-Machine-Interaction group German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI) Innovative Factory Systems (IFS) Trippstadter Strasse 122 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany Tel./Fax/Mobile/E-Mail/Web +49 (0) 631 / 205 75 3415 +49 (0) 631 / 205 75 3402 +49 (0) 157 / 725 95 865 Gerrit.Meixner@dfki.de http://www.dfki.de ======================== Legal statement: Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz GmbH Trippstadter Strasse 122 67663 Kaiserslautern Geschäftsführung: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender), Dr. Walter Olthoff Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313 ========================
Received on Monday, 26 November 2012 12:26:41 UTC