Re: [Maturity] Model Task Force 05-15-24 Meeting Agenda

Hi,
I have a conflict for the first half, but should be able to join for the
second half.

Stacey

sent from my phone

On Wed, May 15, 2024, 12:54 AM David Fazio <dfazio@helixopp.com> wrote:

> Here are the Minutes from our last meeting:
>
>
>
> *https://www.w3.org/2024/05/01-maturity-minutes.html
> <https://www.w3.org/2024/05/01-maturity-minutes.html>*
>
>
>
> Email Archive:
>
>
>
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-maturity/
>
>
>
> What:  Maturity Model Weekly Teleconference
>
>
>
> When: Wednesday 15 May 2024
>
>
>
> *11:00 AM*        Boston -- U.S. Eastern  Time            (EDT: UTC -4:00)
>
>
>
> Corresponding times in other time zones are:
>
>
>
> *http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Maturity+Model+Subgroup+Teleconference&iso=20240515T11&p1=43&ah=1
> <http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Maturity+Model+Subgroup+Teleconference&iso=20240515T11&p1=43&ah=1>*
>
>
>
>
> Where:  Zoom Teleconference Service
>
>
>
> Please access Zoom via the link below:
>
>
>
> *https://www.w3.org/2017/08/telecon-info_maturity-model
> <https://www.w3.org/2017/08/telecon-info_maturity-model>*
>
>
>
> IRC: irc.w3.org
> <http://irc.w3.orgqhKKY57jjn8X4XvUUNZK7qRiY9WrlWsQ6AjP9AIhAK6GwkarYyHv7O099KZWMixgDit8-uqdc3DQ4IV3uwMn> Channel:
> #maturity
>
>
>
> *Agenda*
>
>
>
> Agenda+ New Business
>
>
>
>
>
> Agenda+ Github Issues 43, 78, 85, 102, 103, 104 (Usability doc feedback)
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Wrhomdc2gJWIkDPOveiH3_ig1bddTMonEhIDZIzohrc/edit#heading=h.93exgeg396jg>
> – Look at Procurement Dimension
>
>
>
> Agenda+ Maturity Model Scoring Subgroup Update
>
>
>
>
>
> Agenda+ Github Issue #107 Definition of "Full maturity" needs to be
> adjusted, as there is no need to optimize anymore by then
> <https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/issues/107>
>
>
>
> Agenda+ Github Issue #154 Section 3.3.1: can a measure of support
> effectiveness be included?
> <https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/issues/154>
>
>
>
> Agenda+ Github #156 Issue Section 3.5: proof points should consider
> whether people with disabilities actually were included in the workforce as
> a result of the efforts made.
> <https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/issues/156>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>