Re: [Maturity] Model Task Force 05-10-23 Agenda

Hi all,

Apologies for radio silence from me lately. I hope to be able to rejoin 
over the coming weeks but wont make today.

Thanks



    Joshue O'Connor
Director / InterAccess.ie
(+353) 01 961 0059












------ Original Message ------
From "David Fazio" <dfazio@helixopp.com>
To "public-maturity@w3.org" <public-maturity@w3.org>
Date 10/05/2023 5:04:01 AM
Subject [Maturity] Model Task Force 05-10-23 Agenda

>Here are the Minutes from our last meeting:
>
>
>
>https://www.w3.org/2023/05/03-maturity-minutes.html 
><https://www.w3.org/2023/05/03-maturity-minutes.html>
>
>
>
>Email archive: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-maturity/
>
>
>
>What:   Maturity Model Weekly Teleconference
>
>
>
>When:   Wednesday 10 May
>
>
>
>11:00 AM        Boston -- U.S. Eastern  Time            (EDT: UTC 
>-4:00)
>
>
>
>Corresponding times in other time zones are:
>
>
>
>http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Maturity+Model+Subgroup+Teleconference&iso=20230510T11&p1=43&ah=1
>
>
>
>Where:  Zoom Teleconference Service
>
>
>
>Please access Zoom via the link below:
>
>
>
>https://www.w3.org/2017/08/telecon-info_maturity-model
>
>
>
>IRC: irc.w3.org Channel: #maturity
>
>
>
>Agenda
>
>
>
>Agenda+Discuss Publication Update Expectations
>
>
>
>Agenda+ Under 3.4.1.2 Development category of proof points, the 
>examples of “Accessible developer implementation resources” seem more 
>about information. Where might you consider software and hardware tools 
>that help with accessible development, such as access to screen readers 
>or switches?
>
>
>
>Agenda+Revisit Susanna’s updates to Support Dimension 
>https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-maturity/2023Apr/0013.html 
><https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-maturity/2023Apr/0013.html>
>
>
>
>Agenda+ Continue discussion on TLDR 
>https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-maturity/2023Apr/0007.htmland 
><https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-maturity/2023Apr/0007.htmland> 
>Use Case 
>https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-maturity/2023Apr/0019.html 
><https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-maturity/2023Apr/0019.html> 
>Integration
>
>
>
>Agenda+ Continuation of Maturity Model review discussion with Stacey:
>
>
>
>·  I know this is trying to be agnostic so it can cover a wide variety 
>of businesses, education, government… But as I'm looking at the proof 
>point section, I could see where something like this could be broken up 
>into areas that match more closely to how an entity might be structured 
>for better understanding of how it affects how they run. For example, a 
>large corporation has an operations area. Accessible communications 
>might fall into operational standards (or even HR, depending). There’s 
>a lot of assumption in organizations that accessibility doesn’t reach 
>into those operational areas in the org, and if that’s not clear how 
>will they be set up for better success to implement these types of 
>broad-reaching changes/needs?
>
>
>
>·  I think it’s possible for an org to move back and forth between a 
>stage based on how they’re prioritizing, funding and staffing the 
>initiatives. Similar to the design phases within SDLC. Teams might go 
>back and forth depending on new insights/data, prioritization and 
>staffing, or even if there’s a pivot.
>
>
>
>·  I like how there are ratings for the dimensions. I don’t think I 
>caught that earlier in the introduction that this would be the case.
>
>
>
>·  Looking at the spreadsheet (and I wasn’t sure on which tabs were the 
>newest or ones I should look at) - the spaces for evidence make it seem 
>like an easy thing to track and then list out. But it can be really 
>weighty and time consuming. And what if one or two teams are doing 
>amazing but others are struggling? How does that affect how you 
>document and evaluate maturity in this model? Could be cool to have the 
>evidence evaluation for the gaps so they know where to shore up and 
>focus (that might be the intention here already?).
>
>
>
>·  I can see this being very overwhelming and just documenting 
>everything on an on-going basis could be someone’s full time job. Many 
>companies don’t provide a program manager, product, TPM or other to 
>assist in accessibility efforts. This may be quite hard for many to 
>implement.
>
>
>
>·  Looking at the first tab for spider graph, this is actually a very 
>simple and easy way to understand experience and maturity and is 
>commonly used in performance evaluations/discussions and competencies. 
>I actually wonder if there’s a simple version for people without 
>experts or for smaller businesses that will need less. Maybe there’s 
>something in this model as a first step into how to start and build 
>this journey?
>
>
>
>Agenda+ New business
>
>
>
>
>
>David Fazio, President |
>signature_1633184954
><https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidpfazio/>
>
>A picture containing sitting Description automatically generated
>|
>Cooperative Understanding Facilitator of Human Inclusion Badge
><https://api.badgr.io/public/assertions/FheI3FldQkqkfO0AxMbmgQ?identity__email=dfazio%40helixopp.com> 
>|
>signature_1943303136
><https://www.linkedin.com/company/helixopportunity>
>
>P. +1 415.882.6034| e. dfazio@helixopp.com| W.  www.helixopp.com
>
>2023 Official National Minority Supplier Diversity Council Minority 
>Business Enterprise Seal
>
>Disability-Owned Business Enterprise Badge
>
>International Association of Accessibility Professionals Organizational 
>Member Badge
>
>Logo HR Certification Institute 2022 Approved Provider Seal
>
>Society for Human Resource Management Approved Provider Badge
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>