Re: [Maturity] Model Task Force 12-06-23 Meeting Agenda

Regrets for the meeting, I have a conflicting meeting.

Regards
Nadine


> David Fazio <dfazio@helixopp.com> hat am 6. Dezember 2023 um 05:26 geschrieben:
> 
>     sorry everyone. I forgot the subject line in the earlier email. Here it is corrected
> 
>     Sheri will Chair tomorrow’s meeting. I will be absent. 
> 
>     Here are the Minutes from our last meeting:
>      
>     https://www.w3.org/2023/11/29-maturity-minutes.html https://www.w3.org/2023/11/15-maturity-minutes.html
> 
>     Email Archive:
>      
>     https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-maturity/ https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-maturity/
>      
>     What:   Maturity Model Weekly Teleconference
>      
>     When:   Wednesday 06 December 2023
>      
>     11:00 AM        Boston -- U.S. Eastern  Time            (EDT: UTC -4:00)
>      
>     Corresponding times in other time zones are:
>      
>     http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Maturity+Model+Subgroup+Teleconference&iso=20231206T12&p1=43&ah=1 http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Maturity+Model+Subgroup+Teleconference&iso=20231129T11&p1=43&ah=1  
>      
>     Where:  Zoom Teleconference Service
>      
>     Please access Zoom via the link below:
>      
>     https://www.w3.org/2017/08/telecon-info_maturity-model https://www.w3.org/2017/08/telecon-info_maturity-model
>      
>        IRC: irc.w3.org http://irc.w3.orgqhKKY57jjn8X4XvUUNZK7qRiY9WrlWsQ6AjP9AIhAK6GwkarYyHv7O099KZWMixgDit8-uqdc3DQ4IV3uwMn  Channel: #maturity
>         
>     Agenda
>         
>     Agenda+ New Business
> 
>     Agenda+ CSUN (should we meet)
> 
>     Agenda+ Working Draft end of year update 
> 
>     Agenda+ Do we cite a particular WCAG profile as a conformance target? It seems reasonable to cite that WCAG profile A would arguably be in (Lionel’s question) 
>      
>     Agenda+ MM Draft usability update (GitHub Issue 43)
> 
>     Agenda+ GitHub Issue #132 (see previous minutes)
>      
>     Agenda+ Github Issue #79 Section 3.3.2 Rating for evaluation - Support: Outcomes for optimize stage don't align with proof points https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/issues/79  coincides with issue 172. (Jeff was going to work on it. See previous minutes.)
> 
>         
>     Agenda+ Github Issue #83 Section 3.7.2 Ratings for Evaluation - Culture: proof points vs. ratings mismatch https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/issues/83
>      
>     Agenda+ Github Issue #85 Inconsistencies in Inactive ratings for various dimensions https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/issues/85
>      
>     Agenda + Github Issue #89 ICT Development Lifecycle ratings outcomes aren't stated like the outcomes are in Silver https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/issues/89
> 
>     Sent from my iPhone
>