Re: Questions from our Engineering team

Hi,

Question number one is a bit out of context for me (maybe because I wasn't
in the meeting today?). What areas are you referring to? I'd like to take a
look at the design process areas more.

As a general comment (speaking as a designer and manager of design teams),
there are specific activities that any designer or design team should be
doing regardless of size. But that doesn't mean they're actually doing them
in reality. Perhaps we need to consider outcome based rather than specific
activity or process based so it's more flexible for size/how teams need to
work?

Thanks,
Stacey

sent from my phone

On Wed, Apr 19, 2023, 11:12 AM Charles LaPierre <charlesl@benetech.org>
wrote:

> In filling out the ICT section, our Engineers had these two questions.
>
>
>
>    1. Some of the design process questions seem to make sense for large
>    organizations where process, templates and checklists are more formal parts
>    of a large organization. Where there discussions of how these might be
>    framed for small organizations? (e.g. we do not have a formal design review
>    process, but we do have design reviews; is the way forward to become more
>    formal even if the team has three members?)
>    2. Under 3.4.1.2 Development category of proof points, the examples of
>    “Accessible developer implementation resources” seem more about
>    information. Where might you consider software and hardware tools that help
>    with accessible development, such as access to screen readers or switches?
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Charles
>
> EOM
>
>
>
> Charles LaPierre
>
> Principal, Accessibility and Content Quality Architect
>
> Benetech
>
> Twitter: @CLaPierreA11Y
>