Re: My htoughts

+1 on all points.

Best,
Peter.

2018-02-15 19:31 GMT+01:00 Daniel Marques <dani@wiris.com>:

> Hi everybody,
>
> I'm talking about ePub but the ideas are still valid for HTM:
>
>    1. It is up to the publisher to use MathML in their internal workflow.
>    A "source" ePub could have MathML (or LaTeX). Why not?
>    2. Publish ePub with HTML-css-webfonts and svg only (because MathML is
>    not ready and might never be).
>    3. Find a solution for accessibility and interoperability. There is
>    work here to be done. Here is where the compromises and common solutions
>    have to be taken, not at point 2.
>
> Other considerations
>
>    1. Publishers should be free to use JavaScript if they thing is a
>    solution or wants to use LaTeX or MathML inside the published ePub. As
>    comparison, is there anything that forbids the creation of <table>'s using
>    JavaScript inside an ePub?
>    2. Please, do not create a new standard because it will have the same
>    faults as MathML.
>    3. Again, a publisher should feel free to use Web Components for
>    representing mathematics.
>    4. Let MathML be as it is right now.
>
>
> Dani
>
> ------------------------------
> WIRIS and Design Science, makers of MathType, have joined forces!
> Thank you for your patience as we transition from dessci.com to wiris.com.
>

Received on Thursday, 15 February 2018 19:30:23 UTC