- From: Peter Krautzberger <peter@krautzource.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 20:29:38 +0100
- To: Daniel Marques <dani@wiris.com>
- Cc: "public-mathonw." <public-mathonwebpages@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 15 February 2018 19:30:23 UTC
+1 on all points. Best, Peter. 2018-02-15 19:31 GMT+01:00 Daniel Marques <dani@wiris.com>: > Hi everybody, > > I'm talking about ePub but the ideas are still valid for HTM: > > 1. It is up to the publisher to use MathML in their internal workflow. > A "source" ePub could have MathML (or LaTeX). Why not? > 2. Publish ePub with HTML-css-webfonts and svg only (because MathML is > not ready and might never be). > 3. Find a solution for accessibility and interoperability. There is > work here to be done. Here is where the compromises and common solutions > have to be taken, not at point 2. > > Other considerations > > 1. Publishers should be free to use JavaScript if they thing is a > solution or wants to use LaTeX or MathML inside the published ePub. As > comparison, is there anything that forbids the creation of <table>'s using > JavaScript inside an ePub? > 2. Please, do not create a new standard because it will have the same > faults as MathML. > 3. Again, a publisher should feel free to use Web Components for > representing mathematics. > 4. Let MathML be as it is right now. > > > Dani > > ------------------------------ > WIRIS and Design Science, makers of MathType, have joined forces! > Thank you for your patience as we transition from dessci.com to wiris.com. >
Received on Thursday, 15 February 2018 19:30:23 UTC