Re: MathOnWeb CG -- meeting minutes 2018-08-30

Ah, I see how you did it. I was desperately trying to put code into
the page without success... So only added a single link.
Well done! Thanks for all the work.

I added a bit to continuous fractions. I also have Inference Rules
running in MJ3, so I might just add a page to repo and link to it.

Best,
Volker
On Fri, 31 Aug 2018 at 18:39, Neil Soiffer <soiffer@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> * Peter: as per actio, I created the wiki page discussed on Monday for a11y TF
>
> I filled in the wiki page with examples and some text and a few more forms. Unfortunately, the math isn't aligned well with the text, but it is the best I could do with the wiki.
>
>     Neil
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 1:44 AM, Peter Krautzberger <peter@krautzource.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Here are the minutes from the meeting on August 30.
>>
>> In the meeting, we decided to reduce the main meeting to a monthly one. So the next meeting of the full CG will be Sept 27 (but TFs continue to meet bi-weekly).
>>
>> Best,
>> Peter.
>>
>> # MathOnWeb CG 2018-08-30
>>
>> * Present: Peter, Neil, Dani, Kevin
>>   * regrets: Joanie, Volker, Charles
>> * Peter: as per actio, I created the wiki page discussed on Monday for a11y TF
>>   * I also created one for CSS TF as per the last meeting
>>     * prepping for tpac should be priority for the next few weeks
>>   * Neil: who's going?
>>     * Peter:  https://github.com/w3c/mathonwebpages/wiki/MathOnWeb-CG-@-TPAC-2018
>> * Dani: now that TFs meet, can we reduce the Thursday meetings?
>>   * once a month? less?
>>   * Neil: having a meeting would be good, e.g., I can't make the CSS TF meetings
>>   * => AGREED: 1 main meeting per month is enough right now
>> * Neil: does anyone know more about MathML related funding?
>>   * Sloan giving to NISO https://www.niso.org/niso-io/newsline/2018/08/newsline-august-2018?
>>   * => interesting news, not much info to be found, nobody had heard more
>> * Dani: on a11y. say we want to label something as fraction
>>   * with a dictionary, we have to make it open
>>   * but another question is navigating through an expression
>>   * we seem to mixing these and get confused over it
>>   * e.g. an role for fraction is a feature
>>   * but is not sufficient for what we want to do
>>     * e.g. aria-label overwrites entire accessible name
>>     * e.g. on the other hand aria-owns describes structure differntly
>>   * when talking to ARIA/APA we should separate those clearly
>>   * Peter: yes, I think some of Monday's meeting was already going in this direction
>>   * Neil: right, extracting the semantics even falls into two parts: inference and speech/etc generation, then there's navigation
>>
>>
>

Received on Friday, 31 August 2018 21:01:26 UTC