- From: Neil Soiffer <soiffer@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 12:36:27 -0700
- To: public-mathml4@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAESRWkBfZH1GWx99JUP9Rnb8z7W5x+81sr7XrX=dJOKyk-9TTw@mail.gmail.com>
Note: we will meet again next week. Several members will be at Igalia at a hackfest. If we can't find a quiet area, we may have to cancel at the very last minute. Attendees: - Fred Wang - Brian Kardell - Neil Soiffer Regrets: Murray Sargent, David Carisle, Patrick Ion Agenda: https://github.com/mathml-refresh/mathml/issues/8#issuecomment-538263480 MathML Conference(s)/Event(s)? FW: There is a hackfest at Igalia next week. Not focused specifically on MathML, but some MathML work will likely get done. FW: Igalia has some interest in hosting a small MathML meeting (e.g. at the Igalia office?). FW: Maybe a meeting at TPAC sometime? NS: Probably should bring this up to the full group. Operator Dictionary updates? (David) - U+1EEF0 and U+1EEF1 #6 <https://github.com/mathml-refresh/mathml/issues/6> => proposal: use lspace=1,rspace=2 (like sum/product) and resolve this issue. - review of accent operators #151 <https://github.com/mathml-refresh/mathml/issues/151> - remove default stretchy property for multi-char operator #143 <https://github.com/mathml-refresh/mathml/issues/143> NS: It seems that we're kind of guessing at what the values should be. FW: My proposal was because the default line spacing is thick-math-spacing, maybe trying to do the same as other operators is better NS: I can't offer anything better FW: The proposal was to close the issue for now, do that and see if someone raises an issue. I think mostly we are waiting for David to update the operator dictionary so we could do that. I think we can move on since he is not here or it isn't ready. NS: I did note one missing operator that should be listed as having the accent property. NS: I see I think 3 that were missing, can we bring those over into #151 and build up a list of the ones we think we should remove accents from. Does that sound reasonable to you? FW: Sure NS: 143 - default stretchy FW: Here too we have work to be done. I prefer to get this all done and update the spec, test, browsers. NS: In the spec, are you bringing in the operator dictionary from somewhere else? FW: It is generated from the file that David is maintaining, that's why we want to get it right NS: OK, that's where we need to make all of these changes. DOM/IDL updates? #83 <https://github.com/mathml-refresh/mathml/issues/83> #138 <https://github.com/mathml-refresh/mathml/issues/138> #139 <https://github.com/mathml-refresh/mathml/issues/139> #140 <https://github.com/mathml-refresh/mathml/issues/140> (Brian) BK: FW is working on them FW: There are some tests that have been added. Been added to Webkit, Gecko, and Blink. Added some WPT tests in addition to what BK has done. FW: tried to write a patch for Firefox and added more tests. Patch has landed along with the test changes FW: Now Gecko is at same level as Webkit. BK: Are these based on their nightlies so eventually will be in default? FW: Yes, so in Gecko and Webkit. Also in Igalia branch of Blink. Clarification for Operator maxsize/minsize: #109 <https://github.com/mathml-refresh/mathml/issues/109> #110 <https://github.com/mathml-refresh/mathml/issues/110> FW: There is some text already in the spec that is what firefox and safari do and what we intended to do in Chromium - just wanted to make sure it makes sense first. For example, what happens when min-size is greater than max-size. Mathplayer does something different (the opposite)? NS: Yes, I think so. We have to resolve it somehow. If we have some conflict we treat it as the FW: when maxisze<minsize, treat maxsize=minsize BK: is there a precedent in CSS with minwidth and maxwidth? BK: See https://drafts.csswg.org/css-sizing-3/#width-height-keywords. Will add what I find to #110 -- it isn’t obvious what is done when reading the spec. - If the min-width is specified with a value greater than max-mix, the min width will be the one that is applied Remove explicit mo@maxsize = "infinity" #107 <https://github.com/mathml-refresh/mathml/issues/107> NS: Can this be set on mstyle, because if it can, then we need a way to override it. FW: No, can’t be set there. So don’t need to override. Only in operator dictionary (where it is not explicitly mentioned) NS: Then I agree it is not useful FW: mstyle still allows it in full NS: so we need a polyfill RESOLVED: remove the maxsize value ‘infinity’ in core WHATWG HTML5 #145 <https://github.com/mathml-refresh/mathml/issues/145> - would referring to MathML Core (draft) instead of MathML3 (W3C rec) cause any problems? Broad discussion on whether it is good (by several measures) for whatwg to link to core (or when). No resolution.
Received on Monday, 7 October 2019 19:37:01 UTC