- From: Neil Soiffer <soiffer@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 17:06:54 -0800
- To: public-mathml4@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAESRWkC3xkovsPJEHsV8sj_uqcFnG6pFNtOAZrYwc9eip8g3KA@mail.gmail.com>
Agenda: https://github.com/mathml-refresh/mathml/issues/91#issuecomment-550460421 Meeting was recorded: https://benetech.zoom.us/recording/share/XP5Bsgesnlompm-iZGIyYqdjrXRJa2fOgKAmbk715PiwIumekTzi MwAttendees: Neil Soiffer David Farmer Charles LaPierre Sam Dooley David Carlise Regrets: Steve Noble Progress on Core: - Fred’s talk <https://people.igalia.com/fwang/mathml-in-browsers-web-engines-hackfest-2019/slides> at Igalia hackfest Chromium - first patches landed - BlinkOn 11 - two MathML talks (brian, fred) will be livestreamed/recorded - TAG Review process #438 - MathML conference next year? NS: probably at Igalia’s HQ in A Coruna, Spain. No idea when or format. CL: Brian Kardell showed Igalia’s MathML at TPAC. It constantly refreshed a bunch of equations. It was really fast. CL: I was a meeting at Microsoft and at a Daisy board meeting where Microsoft was present. Edge is moving to a Chromium-based implementation. They are watching what Igalia is doing and it will be easy to pull that work in when it happens. No guarantee that they will take it though, although they were very impressed with what they have done to date. There wasn’t much note taking for the main part of the meeting. Those interested in details will need to listen to the recording. The main points were: SD: for the sake of argument, let’s call the attr “mathrole”. Should “mathrole” be informative or normative? SD: If one or the other, does that limit its use SD: We need to know how the information is used. NS: That’s still a bit nebulous. Export to computation systems, to things like DF’s PreText, for speech, for braille. NS: The values probably needs to be open-ended DF: Discussion of lines 474 and 475 in SD doc (see agenda) about imaginary units. They have the same semantics. The problem comes up with “i”, which can be a summation index or it can be an imaginary number. What seems to be missing from SD’s chart is a column that says what the semantic is for the entries, and there may be many different semantics for some things. For most, there is a default semantics and there aren’t any other meanings (in non-obscure math). The default meanings need to be listed somewhere, but most are obvious (“sin” is “sine”). The part we need to focus on is those where the symbol has several meanings. There was a lot of discussion between SD and the rest of the group of the necessity of some columns in the table. DF: I’ve gone through several textbooks now looking for areas where there are ambiguities. Sometimes the subject tells you a lot. Sometimes not. In combinatorics, “×” can mean different things in the same sentence. For example: “The 8×8 checkerboard has 8×8 squares”. (the 8 by 8 checkerboard has 8 times 8 squares). Another meaning is cartesian product. It was split almost equally among all the meanings. You needed natural language understanding to distinguish many of these meanings. I’ve gone through an algebra textbook, pre-calculus, a couple of combinatorics books, calculus, and I’m working on probability. Discussion of how to format the data involving semantics, symbol used, and subject area. Put into a spreadsheet and could sort by column? DF: I’m working on https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cZnff5_fi_ucNyZ1ex2msmJLE55FAZD-QInkLYe8xiE/edit Next meeting is next week.
Received on Wednesday, 13 November 2019 01:07:09 UTC