Re: Summary of MathML call meeting

Yes. I believe we agreed that duplicative things that aren't commonly used
could be removed from core because a polyfill can easily generate them. An
example of something that can't be removed is <msup> even though it could
potentially be turned into <msubsup>; the feeling was that was way too
common and core should handle that. We didn't discuss munder/mover. I think
these are much less common than msup/msub, but I would think some sort of
symmetry argument would mean that if msup is in core, mover should be in
core.

    Neil


On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 8:55 AM David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> wrote:

> On 14/03/2019 13:38, Frédéric Wang wrote:
> > Do I remember correctly that we agreed to remove menclose "radical"
> > notation and mglyph (currently not in core):
>
> I'd have no objection to those not being in core.
>
> David
>
>
> *Disclaimer*
>
> The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and
> Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson
> House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. Please see our Privacy
> Notice <https://www.nag.co.uk/content/privacy-notice> for information on
> how we process personal data and for details of how to stop or limit
> communications from us.
>
> This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses and malware, and may have
> been automatically archived by Mimecast Ltd, an innovator in Software as a
> Service (SaaS) for business.
>