Re: github isses

Either solution works for me. Having one main repo only for issues is fine.

Dani

On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 9:21 AM David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> wrote:

> On 20/02/2019 06:45, Neil Soiffer wrote:
> > I think a single repo with labels is the appropriate way to deal with
> > issues for the group.
>
> There seems to be general agreement on having one main repo for issues,
> but do I take it to mean you'd prefer to have them in (full) mathml4
> labelled as impacting core where necessary rather than having them in
> core labelled full where necessary?
>
> I don't mind either way, and didn't move any yet to allow some discussion.
>
> David
>
>
> *Disclaimer*
>
> The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and
> Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson
> House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. Please see our Privacy
> Notice <https://www.nag.co.uk/content/privacy-notice> for information on
> how we process personal data and for details of how to stop or limit
> communications from us.
>
> This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses and malware, and may have
> been automatically archived by Mimecast Ltd, an innovator in Software as a
> Service (SaaS) for business.
>