- From: George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 08:01:23 -0700
- To: 'Frédéric Wang' <fwang@igalia.com>, <public-mathml4@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <000201d4c2e3$d20dee00$7629ca00$@montana.com>
Hello, I have been asked to carry a message concerning Chemistry. I am told that MathML supports Chemistry notation, at least some. However, Assistive Technology cannot determine semantically when it is Math or Chemistry. I know this dips into content versus presentation, but perhaps a bucket for Chemistry could be identified. Best George From: Frédéric Wang <fwang@igalia.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 7:41 AM To: public-mathml4@w3.org Subject: Re: Updated invitation with note: MathML Refresh Meeting On 12/02/2019 12:32, David Carlisle wrote: On 12/02/2019 11:13, Frédéric Wang wrote: > I'm not familiar with that. Can you please explain what is this > discussion about versioning? Whatwg-flavoured html is a "living document" with rolling updates and no version number, w3c-flavoured html is versioned (currently at 5.2) I don't think it's any secret that there is a certain amount of tension behind HTML being published by two organisations with two versioning strategies. We just need to fit in with both in the least disruptive way possible... OK, I guess we should follow W3C's versioning rules if the plan is to release as a W3C spec in the future. IIUC, browser implementers generally just rely on the Working Draft versions. Also, for WhatWG the HTML editors are pretty liberal about pointing to the current best spec. So I think we could have https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#mathml pointing to MathML Core draft once we have a stable URL on our side and the draft is a bit more advanced. We'd want 2/3 browsers to sign off on this reference though. -- Frédéric Wang
Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2019 15:02:15 UTC