- From: David J. Weller-Fahy <dave-lists-public-markdown@weller-fahy.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:03:26 -0500
- To: public-markdown@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20121130140326.GB926@weller-fahy.com>
* Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> [2012-11-29 05:55 -0500]: > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2000/10/swap/grammar/ebnf2turtle.py > [snips] > > Syntax is checked according to XML 1.1 syntax definition > http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml11-20040204/#sec-notation Group: I've also found an EBNF parser which can generate a syntax checker for any EBNF grammar (useful!). It can generate in C, C++, Perl, and Python (but Python is not done according to the website) The links to the online version, and help page, are below. Online version: http://www.w3.org/2005/01/yacker Help and install instructions: http://www.w3.org/1999/02/26-modules/User/Yacker Dave P. was able to get our grammar to parse correctly, but the darn thing eats CR/LF/CRLF combinations as part of its parsing, so that would need to be worked on to get the syntax checking correct. The grammar he got to parse is below. Document ::= Para Term ::= (#xD #xA | #xA #xD | #xD | #xA) Bl ::= WS* Term Para ::= SP? SP? SP? Text+ Term Bl WS ::= (SP | HT)+ @terminals SP ::= #x20 HT ::= #x9 CR ::= #xD LF ::= #xA Text ::= [^#xA#xD] This will at least tell us the EBNF is correct, just like the ebnf2turtle.py script above. Regards, -- dave [ please don't CC me ]
Received on Friday, 30 November 2012 14:04:17 UTC