- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:50:13 +0000
- To: Markdown List <public-markdown@w3.org>
On 28 November 2012 16:39, David J. Weller-Fahy <dave-lists-public-markdown@weller-fahy.com> wrote: >> Sounds sensible. If we can trip over it, so can others. Two options. >> 1. EBNF (Other standards groups must have faced this and defined it?) > > What about using the EBNF form as defined by w3 for XML [1]? > > [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#sec-notation "Simplified EBNF" which isn't defined in their references (odd!) I'll ask in W3C. Note XML doesn't care about newlines! regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2012 16:50:43 UTC