- From: David J. Weller-Fahy <dave-lists-public-markdown@weller-fahy.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:35:39 -0500
- To: public-markdown@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2012 15:36:30 UTC
* Shane McCarron <ahby@aptest.com> [2012-11-28 10:37 -0500]: > I am sure we will need an EBNF. It isn't that awful. But it will be > hard for people not familiar with EBNF to read / review. As I understant it, usually there is an EBNF section. So there would still be a textual description, but the EBNF would be considered the authoritative source, right? Regards, -- dave [ please don't CC me ]
Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2012 15:36:30 UTC