- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 14:33:45 +0000
- To: Markdown List <public-markdown@w3.org>
On 25 November 2012 14:30, Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com> wrote: > > Le 25 nov. 2012 à 23:24, marbux a écrit : >> For example, if we require that they be >> capable of processing headings without trailing hash marks and their >> implementation presently requires trailing hash marks, they will have >> to add support for headings without hash marks in order to claim >> conformance. > > It doesn't work like this. :) I wish it would be working like this, but it doesn't. Markdown is not a new language, it is already a widely deployed language. Not even if the example (which it was, not a mandate) is to sort out the mess that are lists? following that logic Karl, we must define the broken model that is currentMD? regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Sunday, 25 November 2012 14:34:13 UTC