Re: header syntax.

On 25 November 2012 14:30, Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com> wrote:
>
> Le 25 nov. 2012 à 23:24, marbux a écrit :
>>  For example, if we require that they be
>> capable of processing headings without trailing hash marks and their
>> implementation presently requires trailing hash marks, they will have
>> to add support for headings without hash marks in order to claim
>> conformance.
>
> It doesn't work like this. :) I wish it would be working like this, but it doesn't. Markdown is not a new language, it is already a widely deployed language.

Not even if the example (which it was, not a mandate) is to sort out
the mess that are lists?

following that logic Karl, we must define the broken model that is currentMD?

regards




-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

Received on Sunday, 25 November 2012 14:34:13 UTC