Re: header syntax.

On 24 November 2012 13:56, Max Albrecht <1@178.is> wrote:
>
> On 24 Nov 2012, at 09:20, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 1. I think it unlikely that 'all' implementations action all this
>> header syntax in exactly the same way. We have no evidence of that.
>
> Why do you continue to ignore the facts? Every implementation has implemented it.
> Karl provided a link to Babelmark2, which I already re-posted. There are no differences.

No differences in what? How well have you tested it Max?

>
>> Please make your choice using the poll Max and we'll see what the group want.
>
> Well ok, I casted the vote #5, but I still think it's ill-conceived to even try to decide about this topic in this way.

We must disagree on this one then.


> I think that breaking existing documents "just because" is a very bad idea,

I have given my reasons.  We're developing a core profile, a baseline.


Lets wait and see what the majority say Max.


regards
-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

Received on Saturday, 24 November 2012 14:41:45 UTC