- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 14:41:18 +0000
- To: Markdown List <public-markdown@w3.org>
On 24 November 2012 13:56, Max Albrecht <1@178.is> wrote: > > On 24 Nov 2012, at 09:20, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 1. I think it unlikely that 'all' implementations action all this >> header syntax in exactly the same way. We have no evidence of that. > > Why do you continue to ignore the facts? Every implementation has implemented it. > Karl provided a link to Babelmark2, which I already re-posted. There are no differences. No differences in what? How well have you tested it Max? > >> Please make your choice using the poll Max and we'll see what the group want. > > Well ok, I casted the vote #5, but I still think it's ill-conceived to even try to decide about this topic in this way. We must disagree on this one then. > I think that breaking existing documents "just because" is a very bad idea, I have given my reasons. We're developing a core profile, a baseline. Lets wait and see what the majority say Max. regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Saturday, 24 November 2012 14:41:45 UTC