- From: Ryan Freebern <rfreebern@unionstmedia.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:06:14 -0500
- To: Joshua Kalis <kalisjoshua@gmail.com>
- Cc: Markdown List <public-markdown@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAA3rnKZVWthxGtThv=WF4P=3cmM=M1Zn+HmwBmEOOmvxFC48kA@mail.gmail.com>
I find the underline syntax and the hash syntax both attractive, and regularly alternate between them (though not in a single document). I think they're both very widely used and useful in different ways; that said, were I to choose between them, I prefer the underline syntax. Regarding IDs, if we decide to deal with these, we could consider defining an algorithm to create a unique slug based on the header's content. For instance, Part One (The Beginning) ==================== could turn into <h1 id="Part_One_(The_Beginning)">Part One (The Beginning)</h1> and if another h1 with the same content appears, it could have a digit appended. Ryan On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Joshua Kalis <kalisjoshua@gmail.com> wrote: > I think that the underline syntax is ugly and needless with '# header' or > '# header #'. I also think that adding too much to the syntax is going to > be drifting closer and closer to actual markup. I think that MD should > remain simple and light with a focus on content markup only and not worry > about anything structural or programatic; with the exception of a few > things for a11y. Adding ids to tags I think is scope creep. But I could be > wrong... > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > Joshua T Kalis > Web Developer > 517.325.3141 > http://joshuakalis.com > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2012 15:06:45 UTC