Re: Moving on. A basic para

On 21 November 2012 14:11, Ryan Freebern <rfreebern@unionstmedia.com> wrote:

>
> \n\w*\n but yes.
>
>>
>> IMHO that is an unnecessary complexity?
>
>
> It may be, but I'm loathe to write a spec that invalidates markdown
> documents that adhere to the well-defined portions of Gruber's initial
> rules, as I think doing so would decrease the adoption rate.


In which case use Grubers implementation. Or any other.
If other implementations have ideas different from Grubers, this response
is likely from those users? The aim is a baseline over 'most' / many of the
implementations, not a faithful to one specification?
Did you not agree with that idea?

regards





-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2012 14:15:39 UTC