- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 17:56:29 +0000
- To: Markdown List <public-markdown@w3.org>
On 20 November 2012 17:46, Pablo Olmos de Aguilera C.
<pablo@glatelier.org> wrote:
> On 20 November 2012 13:28, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 20 November 2012 15:11, Ryan Freebern <rfreebern@unionstmedia.com> wrote:
>>> Re: the scope, I know most discussion so far has centered on the markdown →
>>> HTML flow, but is there value in writing the spec using generic terms
>>> ("Level one header", "numbered list", etc.) rather than explicitly referring
>>> to HTML tags?
>>
>> Please shout if you agree or disagree (and tell us why)
>
> I agree, but with the condition that the markup and the spec will
> explain the transformation to HTML by itself.
As a secondary task, i.e. part of the first transform to XHTML 1.1 + Aria.
The first task is to define syntax and semantics in a format neutral manner.
Is that OK?
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2012 17:56:59 UTC