- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 17:56:29 +0000
- To: Markdown List <public-markdown@w3.org>
On 20 November 2012 17:46, Pablo Olmos de Aguilera C. <pablo@glatelier.org> wrote: > On 20 November 2012 13:28, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 20 November 2012 15:11, Ryan Freebern <rfreebern@unionstmedia.com> wrote: >>> Re: the scope, I know most discussion so far has centered on the markdown → >>> HTML flow, but is there value in writing the spec using generic terms >>> ("Level one header", "numbered list", etc.) rather than explicitly referring >>> to HTML tags? >> >> Please shout if you agree or disagree (and tell us why) > > I agree, but with the condition that the markup and the spec will > explain the transformation to HTML by itself. As a secondary task, i.e. part of the first transform to XHTML 1.1 + Aria. The first task is to define syntax and semantics in a format neutral manner. Is that OK? regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2012 17:56:59 UTC