- From: Shane McCarron <ahby@aptest.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:15:26 -0600
- To: Markdown List <public-markdown@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOk_reF5JV6HiFaqmqk0Co8vDyup-gPEham4DAZJNNxAsOYRqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Yeah - I think their definition of the word is silly. The original XHTML Note about it didn't use that word. See http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/NOTE-xhtml-media-types-20090116/ for pretty reasonable guidance. There was a Draft that never god published for political reasons that was even better... it is at http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2010/ED-xhtml-media-types-20100218/ On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:10 AM, marbux <marbux@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Shane McCarron <ahby@aptest.com> wrote: > > Earlier people mentioned polyglot markup and it seemed to scare others. > > Polyglot is an HTML5-introduced term for something we defined way back > when > > for XHTML 1.0. It just means markup that is valid XHTML and also works > well > > in HTML user agents. The current generation polyglot spec is at > > http://www.w3.org/TR/html-polyglot/ > > Thanks for that wisdom, Shane. I was assuming incorrectly something > along the lines of the common and ordinary meaning of "polyglot". > > Paul > -- Shane P. McCarron Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2012 16:15:54 UTC