- From: Shane McCarron <ahby@aptest.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 07:34:55 -0600
- To: Markdown List <public-markdown@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOk_reH5dHbKDwKPLGgD21YcLgfR-nvh8sXm8RhGJcaADFPTgA@mail.gmail.com>
Earlier people mentioned polyglot markup and it seemed to scare others. Polyglot is an HTML5-introduced term for something we defined way back when for XHTML 1.0. It just means markup that is valid XHTML and also works well in HTML user agents. The current generation polyglot spec is at http://www.w3.org/TR/html-polyglot/ In my mind it is trivial to have MD output polyglot - and it means it is readily parseable in an XML toolchain if someone wants to do something cool with the output. On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> wrote: > On 20 November 2012 13:19, Shane McCarron <ahby@aptest.com> wrote: > > >> I really don't think a processing chain is within spec for the group > >> Shane? Do you? > > > > > > No. I was just saying that we could define one for our own internal use > if > > we wanted to author the spec in MD but still produce W3C-appropriate > (X)HTML > > output. > > Karl has kindly offered to do that for us, but agreed, it would > perhaps be of use for others. > another advantage of generating xhtml as apposed to html? > > regards > > > > -- > Dave Pawson > XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. > Docbook FAQ. > http://www.dpawson.co.uk > > -- Shane P. McCarron Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2012 13:35:22 UTC