Re: Question regarding scope

 From: Ian Hamilton <i_h@hotmail.com
<i_h@hotmail.com?Subject=Re%3A%20Question%20regarding%20scope&In-Reply-To=%3CDUB405-EAS321FA86F99DD93A94ABD62A918B0%40phx.gbl%3E&References=%3CDUB405-EAS321FA86F99DD93A94ABD62A918B0%40phx.gbl%3E>>

Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 08:10:13 -0700
Message-ID: <DUB405-EAS321FA86F99DD93A94ABD62A918B0@phx.gbl>
To: public-low-vision-comments@w3.org
<public-low-vision-comments@w3.org?Subject=Re%3A%20Question%20regarding%20scope&In-Reply-To=%3CDUB405-EAS321FA86F99DD93A94ABD62A918B0%40phx.gbl%3E&References=%3CDUB405-EAS321FA86F99DD93A94ABD62A918B0%40phx.gbl%3E>

Hello!
The definitions from the impairment side seem clear enough, but there
doesn't seem to be a definition of 'electronic content'. Is it
intended to cover, for example, content transmitted by communication
systems such as Skype (thinking CVAA)? Or video games?
Ian Hamilton

------

Thank you for your comment. After discussion

​The group decided not to define electronic content.
<https://www.w3.org/2016/04/06-lvtf-minutes.html#resolution02>​

-- 
Jim Allan,
​Facilitator - Low Vision Task Force​

Accessibility Coordinator
Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired
1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756
voice 512.206.9315    fax: 512.206.9264  http://www.tsbvi.edu/
"We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964

Received on Tuesday, 18 April 2017 19:29:35 UTC