Re: ... WAI social image template (including for WCAG 3) and icons from Andrew Somers on 2021-04-01 (public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org from April 2021)

From: Andrew Somers <andy@generaltitles.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 17:17:07 -0700
To: Bruce Bailey <Bailey@Access-Board.gov>
Cc: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>, Christopher Loiselle <chris.loiselle@oracle.com>, Rachael Bradley Montgomery <rachael@accessiblecommunity.org>, Chuck Adams <charles.adams@oracle.com>, Todd Libby <toddlibby@protonmail.com>, Shawn Lauriat <lauriat@google.com>, "jon.avila@levelaccess.com" <jon.avila@levelaccess.com>, Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>, Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>, public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Message-Id: <AC14D81D-B648-4957-A4EC-006858B8FD54@generaltitles.com>
Responses inline:

> On Mar 31, 2021, at 4:04 PM, Bruce Bailey <Bailey@Access-Board.gov> wrote:
> 
> Andy, from the email thread I understood that the image will be typically be scaled down under most use cases.  I also understood Shawn to be saying that WAI wants a high bar for the contrast in this image.

Ah okay, well if we take a quick look, we see the words "Web Accessibility initiative” which per the guideline shoudl be 14px-16px, but must be no less than 12px. The icons are about twice that, thus should always be at least 24px (equivalent).



And: I was analizing the design only on contrast.

OPINION ON THE ICON DESIGNS

If you would like an opinion on the icon designs regarding making a “good example” of accessible design, then these fail not due to contrast but due to too-thin of a stroke width. If we look at examples of design for ease of recognition and discernibility, you’ll notice that hollow thin outlines are generally not used.

Again, like all things in perception you can not say that “solid is always better than hollow icons” as there are a number if independent factors.

But solid icons have a naturally lower spatial frequency, meaning better contrast especially for people with impairments. There are still cases where an “online type” works better due to having “fine details” or importantly, somethign expected to be hollow, such as a magnifying glass or a speech bubble.

Nevertheless, studies have shown that by and large, solid icons, especially representing real objects, tend to be more recognizable and discernable.

And hollow icons are assisted by using bold outlines combined with some solid details. In the present case, the hand is better as a solid, and the brain woeks better as a solid (identifying that it is the focus) and the head outline around the brain would do well to be at least twice ther present thickness.

This applies similarly to the other icoes: either the “white” of the eye or the pupil would be better solid, for the ear, a single thick solid line instead of two thin lines, etc.


FWIW I am generally influenced by Raymond Loewy. The direction he took roward modern icon/logo design is still present all around us. Simple/solid. 


A


> Shawn, the good news is that I do not believe we use exactly the correct hex value.
>  
> As you note, the calculated contrast of your gold versus ww3c-classic (blue) is 4.6:1
> https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/?fcolor=EED009&bcolor=005A9C <https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/?fcolor=EED009&bcolor=005A9C>
>  
> The bad news is that the Lc value is still a bit short, 59.7, of the 60 which I have in my mind as what should be the minimum threshold for body text.
> https://www.myndex.com/SAPC/?BG=005a9c&TXT=eed009 <https://www.myndex.com/SAPC/?BG=005a9c&TXT=eed009>
>  
> As Andy notes, probably Lc values should be rounded to nearest whole number, but we are still wrestling with all that.  The math and science is all very defensible.  Failing a page due to a fraction of a decimal, not so much.  OTOH, people have seemed to make their peace with the idea that 4.49:1 not being good enough.
>  
>  
> From: Andrew Somers <andy@generaltitles.com> 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 5:57 PM
> To: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
> Cc: Christopher Loiselle <chris.loiselle@oracle.com>; Bruce Bailey <Bailey@Access-Board.gov>; Rachael Bradley Montgomery <rachael@accessiblecommunity.org>; Chuck Adams <charles.adams@oracle.com>; Todd Libby <toddlibby@protonmail.com>; Shawn Lauriat <lauriat@google.com>; jon.avila@levelaccess.com; Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>; Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>; public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: ... WAI social image template (including for WCAG 3) and icons
>  
> Hi Shawn, 
>  
> The WCAG 3.0 visual contrast is not a minimum of Lc 60 for non text objects. 60 is the minimum for medium size text needing fluent readability. Lc 45 is a minimum for large size text needing flent readability. Lc 30 is the minimum for bold non-content text. Small text on the other hand can need a minimum of 75 or 90, depending on context.
>  
> Those icons are of a size and stroke width where the minimum would be more like Lc 45, relative to a simplified guideline we are now working on in the group. (To be presented in the near future).
>  
> Also Lc values can be rounded to the nearest whole number, and 59.7 rounds to 60.
>  
> As for WCAG 2.x, the 4.5:1 applies to text. IIRC all non-text for 2.x is 3:1, and APCA Lc 45 is sort of like 3:1
>  
> You’ll notice in WCAG 2.x math, that as color pairs get darker, what the 2.x math reports as 4.5:1 will be substantially lower than APCA Lc 60 — this is because WCAG 2.x is not perceptual, whereas APCA follows human perception. An extreme example of this is is text #000 and BG #757575 — this is WCAG2.x of 4.55:1, but APCA Lc 32, or inverted, Lc -29.6 
>  
> In other words, what WCAG 2.x calls 4.55:1 in the above #0/#75 example is a fail for content text under APCA, as it should be. Dark color pairs are where WCAG 2.x has the most false passes, allowing color pairs that should fail.
>  
> Nevertheless, as I mentioned in the earlier analysis, the colors specified for the WAI icons are more than enough for discernibility given the icon size and context of use. 
>  
>  
> Thank you!
>  
> Andy
>  
>  
> 
> 
> On Mar 31, 2021, at 1:57 PM, Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org <mailto:shawn@w3.org>> wrote:
>  
> Hi Chris, Bruce, Andy, Jeanne,
> 
> Thank you for taking the time to analyze the contrast and carefully consider the situation.
> 
> The colors are taken from the WAI website color palette:
>            https://wai-website-theme.netlify.app/components/colors/ <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwai-website-theme.netlify.app%2Fcomponents%2Fcolors%2F&data=04%7C01%7CBailey%40access-board.gov%7Ce886b4f8bb1c413c04ce08d8f48fed1e%7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9%7C0%7C1%7C637528246291700134%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=pdTCmxo3gYYljHuaTL7pU1FmABUuYBK%2FTbQTY9%2FTl4w%3D&reserved=0>
> 
> The yellow #eed009 on blue #005A9C is contrast ratio of 4.6:1
> 
> Regardless of whether one considers these icons optional or required for understanding, I want them to be > 4.5:1 so WAI is demonstrating "best practice". Ideally contrast throughout the WAI website would also meet the draft requirements of WCAG 3 soon.
> 
> If I understand correctly, in the WCAG 3 draft the minimum is Lc 60 and #eed009 on #005A9C is Lc 59.719. If that is true, and you think the WCAG 3 minimum is likely to stay Lc 60, then I probably want to go ahead and make a WAI-website-wide change to that yellow so the contrast is at least Lc 60. However, given that it is *very* close (or exactly with rounding ;-), maybe it's best to wait until WCAG 3 requirements are more stable?
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Best,
> ~Shawn
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 30-Mar-21 9:29 AM, Christopher Loiselle wrote:
> 
> Hi Jeanne and Shawn Henry,
> I’ve included our group’s research on this specific ask. I’ve Cc’d who I believed to be interested in this discussion . If I’m missed anyone in particular , I apologize.
> Thank you,
> Chris
> *From:* Andrew Somers <andy@generaltitles.com <mailto:andy@generaltitles.com>>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 30, 2021 10:05 AM
> *To:* Christopher Loiselle <chris.loiselle@oracle.com <mailto:chris.loiselle@oracle.com>>
> *Cc:* Bruce Bailey <Bailey@Access-Board.gov <mailto:Bailey@Access-Board.gov>>; Todd Libby <toddlibby@protonmail.com <mailto:toddlibby@protonmail.com>>
> *Subject:* Re: [External] : Re: WAI social image template (including for WCAG 3) and icons
> Hey All, and Chris please forward to Jeanne and Shawn and anyone else that might want to see it:
> So, those icons are thin line drawings, and discernibility is relative to that high spatial frequency. They are large, but the stroke is relatively thin, so there are two factors at work here. The size is the dominant importance, as that is the main factor for acuity issues.
> Based on the G-4g constants (current stable candidate at https://www.myndex.com/SAPC/ <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.myndex.com%2FSAPC%2F&data=04%7C01%7CBailey%40access-board.gov%7Ce886b4f8bb1c413c04ce08d8f48fed1e%7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9%7C0%7C1%7C637528246291705121%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=IxtKIfvvkR7HFRtb72iaICRhxZquJqq75pw%2BT3M9eaI%3D&reserved=0><https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.myndex.com/SAPC/__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Kju_qvWssKGLS2nsfkeHc60ibMJT97ZHQoTFT7ojfiLnbScevuKdMZ0XDhyjt2L-h8c$ <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.com%2Fv3%2F__https%3A%2Fwww.myndex.com%2FSAPC%2F__%3B!!GqivPVa7Brio!Kju_qvWssKGLS2nsfkeHc60ibMJT97ZHQoTFT7ojfiLnbScevuKdMZ0XDhyjt2L-h8c%24&data=04%7C01%7CBailey%40access-board.gov%7Ce886b4f8bb1c413c04ce08d8f48fed1e%7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9%7C0%7C1%7C637528246291710114%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=qV2vPE7FFtRzFgUVd0St8h1Vg7k2dqFThiwKvwGsOmY%3D&reserved=0>>) the colors are Lc -58.4 — the icons seem to be an equivalent “weight” of about 300, as as can be seen here, for their size it is a pass:
> *DEEPER DIVE:*
> But they are not */“body text which requires fluent readability” /*which is the basis for the “level 60” of the current APCA.
> Nevertheless, as a designer I would not call them “purely decorative” as they are conveying a meaning as indicators of what WCAG applies to. But they are not clickable controls, so they are not “critical” in nature.
> They are not lexical, not processed or filtered by the visual word form area of the brain, but still have lightness contrast requirements.  While there is a lack of research in this specific area (icon vs lexical processing) it is reasonable to assume that the minimum for “spot reading” (letter by letter recognition) is a useful measure for such icons. Lovie-Kitchin determined that spot reading contrast requirements are about a third of the requirements for fluent reading.
> The 1/3rd requirement is where the “absolute minimums” are derived from. 30 for text (1/3rd of 90) and 15 for thick non text (1/3rd of 45).  Because these are thin line drawings, though otherwise large, I’d say a useful minimum falls somewhere between 15 and 30. Since I have been rounding up out of an abundance of caution, 30 would be a very reasonable minimum for those icons in that specific use case. An example would be #b49c27 against the same blue background, which for the line weight APCA reports as suitable for “non-text”.
> Baring further research, the colors indicated are more than sufficient for this specific use case.
> Please le me know if that answers this question. Forward this to any that need to see it...
> Andy
> *Andrew Somers *
> Senior Color Science Researcher
> /PerceptEx Perception Research Project/ <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.myndex.com/perceptex/__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Kju_qvWssKGLS2nsfkeHc60ibMJT97ZHQoTFT7ojfiLnbScevuKdMZ0XDhyjfXVSC0A$ <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.com%2Fv3%2F__https%3A%2Fwww.myndex.com%2Fperceptex%2F__%3B!!GqivPVa7Brio!Kju_qvWssKGLS2nsfkeHc60ibMJT97ZHQoTFT7ojfiLnbScevuKdMZ0XDhyjfXVSC0A%24&data=04%7C01%7CBailey%40access-board.gov%7Ce886b4f8bb1c413c04ce08d8f48fed1e%7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9%7C0%7C1%7C637528246291715105%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=jH3HzVwacvPF%2BQlcMUH0ZNlH%2BEOhXwsF%2BVaUeEuDhhM%3D&reserved=0>>
> P.O.Box 1867 🜛   Hollywood, CA 90078
> Vm/Tx: 213-448-4746 🜛Andy@Myndex.com <mailto:Andy@Myndex.com> <mailto:Andy@Myndex.com <mailto:Andy@Myndex.com>>
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.myndex.com/perceptex/__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Kju_qvWssKGLS2nsfkeHc60ibMJT97ZHQoTFT7ojfiLnbScevuKdMZ0XDhyjfXVSC0A$ <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.com%2Fv3%2F__https%3A%2Fwww.myndex.com%2Fperceptex%2F__%3B!!GqivPVa7Brio!Kju_qvWssKGLS2nsfkeHc60ibMJT97ZHQoTFT7ojfiLnbScevuKdMZ0XDhyjfXVSC0A%24&data=04%7C01%7CBailey%40access-board.gov%7Ce886b4f8bb1c413c04ce08d8f48fed1e%7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9%7C0%7C1%7C637528246291720097%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=sDGxE962fn3TX27am0yR4VoIu1urY1jeps7q7Rvskp0%3D&reserved=0>>
>    On Mar 30, 2021, at 5:06 AM, Christopher Loiselle <chris.loiselle@oracle.com <mailto:chris.loiselle@oracle.com><mailto:chris.loiselle@oracle.com <mailto:chris.loiselle@oracle.com>>> wrote:
>    Hi Andy,
>    I know you are quite busy with other items. I’m wondering if you could weigh in on any additional thoughts by Friday of this week? I could then forward to Jeanne in regard to our groups reply as a subgroup on her ask.
>    Thanks!
>    Chris
>    *From:*Bruce Bailey <Bailey@Access-Board.gov <mailto:Bailey@Access-Board.gov> <mailto:Bailey@Access-Board.gov <mailto:Bailey@Access-Board.gov>>>
>    *Sent:*Monday, March 29, 2021 10:55 AM
>    *To:*Christopher Loiselle <chris.loiselle@oracle.com <mailto:chris.loiselle@oracle.com> <mailto:chris.loiselle@oracle.com <mailto:chris.loiselle@oracle.com>>>; Andrew Somers <andy@generaltitles.com <mailto:andy@generaltitles.com> <mailto:andy@generaltitles.com <mailto:andy@generaltitles.com>>>
>    *Cc:*Todd Libby <toddlibby@protonmail.com <mailto:toddlibby@protonmail.com> <mailto:toddlibby@protonmail.com <mailto:toddlibby@protonmail.com>>>
>    *Subject:*RE: [External] : Re: WAI social image template (including for WCAG 3) and icons
>    Thanks for bringing this up Chris, and to Jeanne for thinking to check!
>    I defer to Andy, but follows is my feedback, higher priority to lower.
>     1. I think we should ask EO to darken the blue or brighten the yellow.  Just a bit.  Are these two particular hues (see how I did not right colour?) take from someplace else?
>         1. For this sort of thing, for people that are paying attention to accessibility, I strongly recommend 4.5:1 per WCAG2x.
>    i.https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/?fcolor=EECB0D&bcolor=005C9D <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwebaim.org%2Fresources%2Fcontrastchecker%2F%3Ffcolor%3DEECB0D%26bcolor%3D005C9D&data=04%7C01%7CBailey%40access-board.gov%7Ce886b4f8bb1c413c04ce08d8f48fed1e%7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9%7C0%7C1%7C637528246291725091%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=gJKtUcmDRt0OQSgJRXROeHYY%2Furm%2Fwc9gcu5XmtNKB0%3D&reserved=0><https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/?fcolor=EECB0D&bcolor=005C9D__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!KVej9JLDnkm0LMrpz5A2mkcszWJnLbsbyaUluDEsjwg8GRqXB249_qoxJdpjmpIgPOw$ <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.com%2Fv3%2F__https%3A%2Fwebaim.org%2Fresources%2Fcontrastchecker%2F%3Ffcolor%3DEECB0D%26bcolor%3D005C9D__%3B!!GqivPVa7Brio!KVej9JLDnkm0LMrpz5A2mkcszWJnLbsbyaUluDEsjwg8GRqXB249_qoxJdpjmpIgPOw%24&data=04%7C01%7CBailey%40access-board.gov%7Ce886b4f8bb1c413c04ce08d8f48fed1e%7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9%7C0%7C1%7C637528246291730084%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=7jNfCgfB2VlLHlOMXZzWl7CShuX5JpEld%2Beh7ScwyZU%3D&reserved=0>>(4.36:1)
>         2. I used the WebAIM tool to bump up the yellow and down the blue, much better IMHO.
>    i.https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/?fcolor=F2D00D&bcolor=005999 <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwebaim.org%2Fresources%2Fcontrastchecker%2F%3Ffcolor%3DF2D00D%26bcolor%3D005999&data=04%7C01%7CBailey%40access-board.gov%7Ce886b4f8bb1c413c04ce08d8f48fed1e%7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9%7C0%7C1%7C637528246291735064%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=MLWE%2BmonHIA0MeWgA70WvEV6h2Yl0Y2uY%2BqVzGtJ%2FQc%3D&reserved=0><https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/?fcolor=F2D00D&bcolor=005999__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!KVej9JLDnkm0LMrpz5A2mkcszWJnLbsbyaUluDEsjwg8GRqXB249_qoxJdpjIddxUs0$ <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.com%2Fv3%2F__https%3A%2Fwebaim.org%2Fresources%2Fcontrastchecker%2F%3Ffcolor%3DF2D00D%26bcolor%3D005999__%3B!!GqivPVa7Brio!KVej9JLDnkm0LMrpz5A2mkcszWJnLbsbyaUluDEsjwg8GRqXB249_qoxJdpjIddxUs0%24&data=04%7C01%7CBailey%40access-board.gov%7Ce886b4f8bb1c413c04ce08d8f48fed1e%7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9%7C0%7C1%7C637528246291740058%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=Z%2ByXD5f7Gu5B6IHJn1XUmG2AIBYX31W3eOcs0PveLVo%3D&reserved=0>>(4.77:1)
>    ii.SAPC-G value of 60.8 L^c
>     2. I disagree with the characterization that this particular use of icons falls into the category of “Simply anything that is purely decorative, non-readable, not needed for understanding content.”
>         1. If the image is a one-time graphic banner, that argument might hold.  But I think the icons might be used elsewhere.  Regardless, I think the icons add value, and being able to readily discern them is important.
>    i.When a content owner asserts that some graphical element is “pure decoration” (and I am thinking is it isn’t), my usual litmus test is to ask them to delete it then.  If they protest too strongly, then I have made my point.  If they don’t really object, then I agree to live with the equivalent of alt="".
>     3. I did not measure, read the chart to say that the original colors hit the 4/5 rating because the icons are large (28px).  My tweaked colors are still 4/5 because they are not 42px high.
>         1. I would love to know if I am reading that correctly or not.
>         2. I think it might be rare for that image to be used at full size, so I agree with treating the icons as text for the purposes of assessing the SAPC value we are looking for.
>     4. I would rather that, since these icons are for WAI portions of the website, that they not be at all marginal.  I would argue that, at least for this use case, we look only at the SAPC value, and not the size and not the integer rating.
>         1. I was going to say I have been thinking about 65 L^c as the minimum.  This kind of example makes me feel better about 60 L^c as the bare baseline.
>    *From:*Christopher Loiselle <chris.loiselle@oracle.com <mailto:chris.loiselle@oracle.com> <mailto:chris.loiselle@oracle.com <mailto:chris.loiselle@oracle.com>>>
>    *Sent:*Monday, March 29, 2021 10:07 AM
>    *To:*Andrew Somers <andy@generaltitles.com <mailto:andy@generaltitles.com> <mailto:andy@generaltitles.com <mailto:andy@generaltitles.com>>>; Bruce Bailey <Bailey@Access-Board.gov <mailto:Bailey@Access-Board.gov> <mailto:Bailey@Access-Board.gov <mailto:Bailey@Access-Board.gov>>>; Todd Libby <toddlibby@protonmail.com <mailto:toddlibby@protonmail.com> <mailto:toddlibby@protonmail.com <mailto:toddlibby@protonmail.com>>>
>    *Subject:*FW: [External] : Re: WAI social image template (including for WCAG 3) and icons
>    Hi Group,
>    Please let me know if you agree.
>    Jeanne was looking for us to evaluate these icons with the new algorithm.  If I follow the presented information, I come up withhttps://www.myndex.com/SAPC/?BG=005c9d&TXT=eecb0d&DEV=98g_d12e&RSH=false&SEL=radioDynamic&BUF=SAPC-D <withhttps://www.myndex.com/SAPC/?BG=005c9d&TXT=eecb0d&DEV=98g_d12e&RSH=false&SEL=radioDynamic&BUF=SAPC-D><https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*2Fwww.myndex.com*2FSAPC*2F*3FBG*3D005c9d*26TXT*3Deecb0d*26DEV*3D98g_d12e*26RSH*3Dfalse*26SEL*3DradioDynamic*26BUF*3DSAPC-D&data=04*7C01*7CBailey*40access-board.gov*7Ca046c1f232db4435790408d8f2bc0eb4*7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9*7C0*7C0*7C637526236811826942*7CUnknown*7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0*3D*7C1000&sdata=zvJFMtRhx3K5FENutv54PphkmSLTmLCagKeqpHy*2FzDo*3D&reserved=0__;JSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJQ!!GqivPVa7Brio!KVej9JLDnkm0LMrpz5A2mkcszWJnLbsbyaUluDEsjwg8GRqXB249_qoxJdpjnN82ca0$ <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.com%2Fv3%2F__https%3A%2Fnam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com%2F%3Furl%3Dhttps*3A*2F*2Fwww.myndex.com*2FSAPC*2F*3FBG*3D005c9d*26TXT*3Deecb0d*26DEV*3D98g_d12e*26RSH*3Dfalse*26SEL*3DradioDynamic*26BUF*3DSAPC-D%26data%3D04*7C01*7CBailey*40access-board.gov*7Ca046c1f232db4435790408d8f2bc0eb4*7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9*7C0*7C0*7C637526236811826942*7CUnknown*7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0*3D*7C1000%26sdata%3DzvJFMtRhx3K5FENutv54PphkmSLTmLCagKeqpHy*2FzDo*3D%26reserved%3D0__%3BJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJQ!!GqivPVa7Brio!KVej9JLDnkm0LMrpz5A2mkcszWJnLbsbyaUluDEsjwg8GRqXB249_qoxJdpjnN82ca0%24&data=04%7C01%7CBailey%40access-board.gov%7Ce886b4f8bb1c413c04ce08d8f48fed1e%7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9%7C0%7C1%7C637528246291745047%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=LE2%2BPTIN3WzWgi25YQ2eXlYLXEI74D%2BzjVofzQYROjw%3D&reserved=0>>with the color picker
>    andhttps://www.myndex.com/SAPC/?BG=005a9c&TXT=eed009&DEV=98g_d12e&RSH=false&SEL=radioDynamic&BUF=SAPC-D <andhttps://www.myndex.com/SAPC/?BG=005a9c&TXT=eed009&DEV=98g_d12e&RSH=false&SEL=radioDynamic&BUF=SAPC-D><https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*2Fwww.myndex.com*2FSAPC*2F*3FBG*3D005a9c*26TXT*3Deed009*26DEV*3D98g_d12e*26RSH*3Dfalse*26SEL*3DradioDynamic*26BUF*3DSAPC-D&data=04*7C01*7CBailey*40access-board.gov*7Ca046c1f232db4435790408d8f2bc0eb4*7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9*7C0*7C0*7C637526236811831933*7CUnknown*7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0*3D*7C1000&sdata=0go6xxg02bNEZn4FTtDSsNFq84cBPyVe*2FdTfdxw7GAE*3D&reserved=0__;JSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJQ!!GqivPVa7Brio!KVej9JLDnkm0LMrpz5A2mkcszWJnLbsbyaUluDEsjwg8GRqXB249_qoxJdpjV9pkigk$ <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.com%2Fv3%2F__https%3A%2Fnam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com%2F%3Furl%3Dhttps*3A*2F*2Fwww.myndex.com*2FSAPC*2F*3FBG*3D005a9c*26TXT*3Deed009*26DEV*3D98g_d12e*26RSH*3Dfalse*26SEL*3DradioDynamic*26BUF*3DSAPC-D%26data%3D04*7C01*7CBailey*40access-board.gov*7Ca046c1f232db4435790408d8f2bc0eb4*7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9*7C0*7C0*7C637526236811831933*7CUnknown*7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0*3D*7C1000%26sdata%3D0go6xxg02bNEZn4FTtDSsNFq84cBPyVe*2FdTfdxw7GAE*3D%26reserved%3D0__%3BJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJQ!!GqivPVa7Brio!KVej9JLDnkm0LMrpz5A2mkcszWJnLbsbyaUluDEsjwg8GRqXB249_qoxJdpjV9pkigk%24&data=04%7C01%7CBailey%40access-board.gov%7Ce886b4f8bb1c413c04ce08d8f48fed1e%7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9%7C0%7C1%7C637528246291750038%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=FNVqn%2Fmav%2BkgFwssmrbviMUvHm0p9pw2T3sNiHMJip0%3D&reserved=0>>  for what Shawn mentions in her email below. This would be in reference to the proposedhttps://www.w3.org/wiki/File:Wai_social_1200x675_acronym.png <proposedhttps://www.w3.org/wiki/File:Wai_social_1200x675_acronym.png>
>    <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*2Fwww.w3.org*2Fwiki*2FFile*3AWai_social_1200x675_acronym.png&data=04*7C01*7CBailey*40access-board.gov*7Ca046c1f232db4435790408d8f2bc0eb4*7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9*7C0*7C0*7C637526236811836923*7CUnknown*7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0*3D*7C1000&sdata=j4GXbyq89A1e*2BHxad7SqR6pxMNhOkDn1HIRKbpbrB9E*3D&reserved=0__;JSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSU!!GqivPVa7Brio!KVej9JLDnkm0LMrpz5A2mkcszWJnLbsbyaUluDEsjwg8GRqXB249_qoxJdpj-bWELSs$ <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.com%2Fv3%2F__https%3A%2Fnam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com%2F%3Furl%3Dhttps*3A*2F*2Fwww.w3.org*2Fwiki*2FFile*3AWai_social_1200x675_acronym.png%26data%3D04*7C01*7CBailey*40access-board.gov*7Ca046c1f232db4435790408d8f2bc0eb4*7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9*7C0*7C0*7C637526236811836923*7CUnknown*7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0*3D*7C1000%26sdata%3Dj4GXbyq89A1e*2BHxad7SqR6pxMNhOkDn1HIRKbpbrB9E*3D%26reserved%3D0__%3BJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSU!!GqivPVa7Brio!KVej9JLDnkm0LMrpz5A2mkcszWJnLbsbyaUluDEsjwg8GRqXB249_qoxJdpj-bWELSs%24&data=04%7C01%7CBailey%40access-board.gov%7Ce886b4f8bb1c413c04ce08d8f48fed1e%7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9%7C0%7C1%7C637528246291755027%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=SiLsomvHDwfbEx5E1VL6vjiYgUePJM1fEMgEIrBKmFs%3D&reserved=0>>, yellow on blue color scheme. In reviewinghttps://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/Visual_Contrast_of_Text_Subgroup <reviewinghttps://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/Visual_Contrast_of_Text_Subgroup>
>    <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*2Fwww.w3.org*2FWAI*2FGL*2Ftask-forces*2Fsilver*2Fwiki*2FVisual_Contrast_of_Text_Subgroup&data=04*7C01*7CBailey*40access-board.gov*7Ca046c1f232db4435790408d8f2bc0eb4*7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9*7C0*7C0*7C637526236811841914*7CUnknown*7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0*3D*7C1000&sdata=Ak47W64S996MKnv6P9bNyQemp*2F*2BvsqCkOsKU6ChwAto*3D&reserved=0__;JSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUl!!GqivPVa7Brio!KVej9JLDnkm0LMrpz5A2mkcszWJnLbsbyaUluDEsjwg8GRqXB249_qoxJdpjI6SxoQE$ <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.com%2Fv3%2F__https%3A%2Fnam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com%2F%3Furl%3Dhttps*3A*2F*2Fwww.w3.org*2FWAI*2FGL*2Ftask-forces*2Fsilver*2Fwiki*2FVisual_Contrast_of_Text_Subgroup%26data%3D04*7C01*7CBailey*40access-board.gov*7Ca046c1f232db4435790408d8f2bc0eb4*7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9*7C0*7C0*7C637526236811841914*7CUnknown*7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0*3D*7C1000%26sdata%3DAk47W64S996MKnv6P9bNyQemp*2F*2BvsqCkOsKU6ChwAto*3D%26reserved%3D0__%3BJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUl!!GqivPVa7Brio!KVej9JLDnkm0LMrpz5A2mkcszWJnLbsbyaUluDEsjwg8GRqXB249_qoxJdpjI6SxoQE%24&data=04%7C01%7CBailey%40access-board.gov%7Ce886b4f8bb1c413c04ce08d8f48fed1e%7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9%7C0%7C1%7C637528246291760022%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=NQaXhU9WPqu9LG2ZqZ2gQcCzr7IMguuNPB7tPd%2BLQ3U%3D&reserved=0>>, these would appear to come under the (UX) Aesthetic Contrast area. I.e., they aren't text per se, but would be in the iconography section / area.
>    (UX) Aesthetic Contrast
>    Simply anything that is purely decorative, non-readable, not needed for understanding content.
>    It can include contrasts that may be helpful for organizing content but are not strictly necessary.
>    *These have no standard other than to not distract nor interfere with use cases A, B, and C*
>    *IF this was comparing these colors for TEXT:*
>    Regarding the Lc value of 59.719 and comparing that to the general guidelines on levels, this would be a bit below the 60 min level,
>    60 • The minimum level recommended for content text, that is, text you want people to read. "Sort of" like the old 4.5:1 in WCAG2.
>    45 • The minimum level for larger text such as headlines, and large text that should be readably fluently. "Sort of" like the old 3:1 in WCAG2.
>    Perhttps://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/Visual_Contrast_of_Text_Subgroup <perhttps://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/Visual_Contrast_of_Text_Subgroup><https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*2Fwww.w3.org*2FWAI*2FGL*2Ftask-forces*2Fsilver*2Fwiki*2FVisual_Contrast_of_Text_Subgroup&data=04*7C01*7CBailey*40access-board.gov*7Ca046c1f232db4435790408d8f2bc0eb4*7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9*7C0*7C0*7C637526236811846904*7CUnknown*7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0*3D*7C1000&sdata=d685hhRlc5mT6Ajd3DOYjN55HKUdXXfeZqRDOHR90Kw*3D&reserved=0__;JSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJQ!!GqivPVa7Brio!KVej9JLDnkm0LMrpz5A2mkcszWJnLbsbyaUluDEsjwg8GRqXB249_qoxJdpj1Mg0IOc$ <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.com%2Fv3%2F__https%3A%2Fnam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com%2F%3Furl%3Dhttps*3A*2F*2Fwww.w3.org*2FWAI*2FGL*2Ftask-forces*2Fsilver*2Fwiki*2FVisual_Contrast_of_Text_Subgroup%26data%3D04*7C01*7CBailey*40access-board.gov*7Ca046c1f232db4435790408d8f2bc0eb4*7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9*7C0*7C0*7C637526236811846904*7CUnknown*7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0*3D*7C1000%26sdata%3Dd685hhRlc5mT6Ajd3DOYjN55HKUdXXfeZqRDOHR90Kw*3D%26reserved%3D0__%3BJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJQ!!GqivPVa7Brio!KVej9JLDnkm0LMrpz5A2mkcszWJnLbsbyaUluDEsjwg8GRqXB249_qoxJdpj1Mg0IOc%24&data=04%7C01%7CBailey%40access-board.gov%7Ce886b4f8bb1c413c04ce08d8f48fed1e%7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9%7C0%7C1%7C637528246291765011%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=m47xvplPOwdk1MrdjbnYTgGQEFV2Wb94lZgkQiXLRiw%3D&reserved=0>>that would give us a score below acceptable minimum and be scored as:
>    Score 2 — "Marginal"
>    The normative minimum for a Score of 2 for the view.
>    Case A, B, and C elements are relaxed relative to level 3. In particular the high-contrast Case A is relaxed, and certain minimum sizes of fonts are relaxed.
>    Intended as a way for sites that are presently passing 1.4.3 contrast (WCAG 2.x AA) provided that the background colors are no darker than #BBB and no Case A content uses a font smaller than 14px.
>    Please feel free to rip me apart and build me back together if I’m not reviewing the correct way.
>    Thanks,
>    Chris
>    -----Original Message-----
>    From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org <mailto:shawn@w3.org> <mailto:shawn@w3.org <mailto:shawn@w3.org>>>
>    Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2021 9:03 PM
>    To: Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com <mailto:jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com><mailto:jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com <mailto:jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>>>
>    Cc:public-wai-cc@w3.org <mailto:public-wai-cc@w3.org> <mailto:public-wai-cc@w3.org <mailto:public-wai-cc@w3.org>>
>    Subject: [External] : Re: WAI social image template (including for WCAG 3) and icons
>    Hi Jeanne,
>    Thanks for the feedback!
>    We designed these icons to work when very small, e.g., the size of the icons in the headings athttps://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.w3.org/WAI/media/av/planning/*-audio-only-checklists__;Iw!!GqivPVa7Brio!NJNE0ENBrW3n3fLgw1MNCC8kIhKXkO54Ma9FWniz9p_9QvOCQMzcGsFVJRRWxafNdkU$ <athttps://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.w3.org/WAI/media/av/planning/*-audio-only-checklists__;Iw!!GqivPVa7Brio!NJNE0ENBrW3n3fLgw1MNCC8kIhKXkO54Ma9FWniz9p_9QvOCQMzcGsFVJRRWxafNdkU$>
>    <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*2Furldefense.com*2Fv3*2F__https*3A*2Fwww.w3.org*2FWAI*2Fmedia*2Fav*2Fplanning*2F*-audio-only-checklists__*3BIw!!GqivPVa7Brio!NJNE0ENBrW3n3fLgw1MNCC8kIhKXkO54Ma9FWniz9p_9QvOCQMzcGsFVJRRWxafNdkU*24&data=04*7C01*7CBailey*40access-board.gov*7Ca046c1f232db4435790408d8f2bc0eb4*7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9*7C0*7C0*7C637526236811851895*7CUnknown*7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0*3D*7C1000&sdata=*2FQf9*2FbplD8gv0LN1cqDH9iJUOnY5Ydq2wPJGnfdFHVY*3D&reserved=0__;JSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlKiUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUl!!GqivPVa7Brio!KVej9JLDnkm0LMrpz5A2mkcszWJnLbsbyaUluDEsjwg8GRqXB249_qoxJdpjg7uMqLk$ <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.com%2Fv3%2F__https%3A%2Fnam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com%2F%3Furl%3Dhttps*3A*2F*2Furldefense.com*2Fv3*2F__https*3A*2Fwww.w3.org*2FWAI*2Fmedia*2Fav*2Fplanning*2F*-audio-only-checklists__*3BIw!!GqivPVa7Brio!NJNE0ENBrW3n3fLgw1MNCC8kIhKXkO54Ma9FWniz9p_9QvOCQMzcGsFVJRRWxafNdkU*24%26data%3D04*7C01*7CBailey*40access-board.gov*7Ca046c1f232db4435790408d8f2bc0eb4*7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9*7C0*7C0*7C637526236811851895*7CUnknown*7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0*3D*7C1000%26sdata%3D*2FQf9*2FbplD8gv0LN1cqDH9iJUOnY5Ydq2wPJGnfdFHVY*3D%26reserved%3D0__%3BJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlKiUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUl!!GqivPVa7Brio!KVej9JLDnkm0LMrpz5A2mkcszWJnLbsbyaUluDEsjwg8GRqXB249_qoxJdpjg7uMqLk%24&data=04%7C01%7CBailey%40access-board.gov%7Ce886b4f8bb1c413c04ce08d8f48fed1e%7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9%7C0%7C1%7C637528246291770005%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=svlltyOiSIk6%2FZmOSsAfEbeboSgHVE05Zf4e2dQ%2Fl%2Bo%3D&reserved=0>> At small size, adding shading and 3D look while being clear would be very difficult if even do-able. We originally were going to have slightly different icons for different sizes -- e.g., with different thickness of lines --  then decided it would be much simpler
>    to have just one set that worked at multiple sizes.
>    Thanks you for checking contrast with proposed new algorithm. I guess that will depend a lot on size,. Note that we plan to provide them in multiple colors: black-white, white-#003366, white-#005A6A, and #eed009-#005A9C
>    Best,
>    ~Shawn
>    On 26-Mar-21 11:03 AM, Jeanne Spellman wrote:
>     > I like the icons generally, although I find them rather flat. Maybe flat is fashionable now, but I would like some subtle shading to give them a more 3D look.  it's not a hill to die on, it's just what I think looks professional.  I also think we should test the contrast with the WCAG3 algorithm, and I'll take that as an action.
>     >
>     > jeanne
>     >
>     > On 3/24/2021 8:42 PM, Shawn Henry wrote:
>     >> Hi WAI CC folks,
>     >>
>     >> We are updating the template that we use for social media images. I will be working with our graphic artist this Friday morning. I hope that we will finalize the design then. We will circulate it for review before we call it done.
>     >>
>     >> A previous draft and the revision suggestions are here:
>     >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.w3.org/wiki/WAI-images*Social_images_update__;Iw!!GqivPVa7Brio!NJNE0ENBrW3n3fLgw1MNCC8kIhKXkO54Ma9FWniz9p_9QvOCQMzcGsFVJRRWLZew73o$ <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.com%2Fv3%2F__https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2Fwiki%2FWAI-images*Social_images_update__%3BIw!!GqivPVa7Brio!NJNE0ENBrW3n3fLgw1MNCC8kIhKXkO54Ma9FWniz9p_9QvOCQMzcGsFVJRRWLZew73o%24&data=04%7C01%7CBailey%40access-board.gov%7Ce886b4f8bb1c413c04ce08d8f48fed1e%7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9%7C0%7C1%7C637528246291779985%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=fdlNK3xCPHRGZ7d9n7kwxvqlEIetBgq6qppOLy2N0YM%3D&reserved=0><https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*2Furldefense.com*2Fv3*2F__https*3A*2Fwww.w3.org*2Fwiki*2FWAI-images*Social_images_update__*3BIw!!GqivPVa7Brio!NJNE0ENBrW3n3fLgw1MNCC8kIhKXkO54Ma9FWniz9p_9QvOCQMzcGsFVJRRWLZew73o*24&data=04*7C01*7CBailey*40access-board.gov*7Ca046c1f232db4435790408d8f2bc0eb4*7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9*7C0*7C0*7C637526236811856887*7CUnknown*7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0*3D*7C1000&sdata=iQilzliNHbLAQh1EZ3ZqmRAbTlW*2FutVeanjLjqo3sfo*3D&reserved=0__;JSUlJSUlJSUlKiUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSU!!GqivPVa7Brio!KVej9JLDnkm0LMrpz5A2mkcszWJnLbsbyaUluDEsjwg8GRqXB249_qoxJdpj8ugFVxI$ <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.com%2Fv3%2F__https%3A%2Fnam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com%2F%3Furl%3Dhttps*3A*2F*2Furldefense.com*2Fv3*2F__https*3A*2Fwww.w3.org*2Fwiki*2FWAI-images*Social_images_update__*3BIw!!GqivPVa7Brio!NJNE0ENBrW3n3fLgw1MNCC8kIhKXkO54Ma9FWniz9p_9QvOCQMzcGsFVJRRWLZew73o*24%26data%3D04*7C01*7CBailey*40access-board.gov*7Ca046c1f232db4435790408d8f2bc0eb4*7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9*7C0*7C0*7C637526236811856887*7CUnknown*7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0*3D*7C1000%26sdata%3DiQilzliNHbLAQh1EZ3ZqmRAbTlW*2FutVeanjLjqo3sfo*3D%26reserved%3D0__%3BJSUlJSUlJSUlKiUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSU!!GqivPVa7Brio!KVej9JLDnkm0LMrpz5A2mkcszWJnLbsbyaUluDEsjwg8GRqXB249_qoxJdpj8ugFVxI%24&data=04%7C01%7CBailey%40access-board.gov%7Ce886b4f8bb1c413c04ce08d8f48fed1e%7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9%7C0%7C1%7C637528246291784976%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=8i%2Fc1wESn%2BNz8CZNhjGWQQDs8fjQXhstSnp1jnoRgkE%3D&reserved=0>>
>     >>
>     >> I welcome your input now.
>     >>
>     >> ---
>     >>
>     >> Also a reminder of the icon set that we finalized last year. [1]
>     >>
>     >> And, here's a listing of existing icons used in WAI documents:
>     >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.w3.org/wiki/WAI-images*Other_icons_and_images__;Iw!!GqivPVa7Brio!NJNE0ENBrW3n3fLgw1MNCC8kIhKXkO54Ma9FWniz9p_9QvOCQMzcGsFVJRRWPxFAhbA$ <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.com%2Fv3%2F__https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2Fwiki%2FWAI-images*Other_icons_and_images__%3BIw!!GqivPVa7Brio!NJNE0ENBrW3n3fLgw1MNCC8kIhKXkO54Ma9FWniz9p_9QvOCQMzcGsFVJRRWPxFAhbA%24&data=04%7C01%7CBailey%40access-board.gov%7Ce886b4f8bb1c413c04ce08d8f48fed1e%7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9%7C0%7C1%7C637528246291789961%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=CJI5ebGSSU2MAaZ4I1QGeA9hTpoEVLimL5r42QVC2ZY%3D&reserved=0><https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*2Furldefense.com*2Fv3*2F__https*3A*2Fwww.w3.org*2Fwiki*2FWAI-images*Other_icons_and_images__*3BIw!!GqivPVa7Brio!NJNE0ENBrW3n3fLgw1MNCC8kIhKXkO54Ma9FWniz9p_9QvOCQMzcGsFVJRRWPxFAhbA*24&data=04*7C01*7CBailey*40access-board.gov*7Ca046c1f232db4435790408d8f2bc0eb4*7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9*7C0*7C0*7C637526236811861875*7CUnknown*7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0*3D*7C1000&sdata=*2BZUziQbEDfKn44WfA1TVBdEkuvGDGcSybdPz8VIl3hg*3D&reserved=0__;JSUlJSUlJSUlKiUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSU!!GqivPVa7Brio!KVej9JLDnkm0LMrpz5A2mkcszWJnLbsbyaUluDEsjwg8GRqXB249_qoxJdpjqTujhgE$ <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.com%2Fv3%2F__https%3A%2Fnam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com%2F%3Furl%3Dhttps*3A*2F*2Furldefense.com*2Fv3*2F__https*3A*2Fwww.w3.org*2Fwiki*2FWAI-images*Other_icons_and_images__*3BIw!!GqivPVa7Brio!NJNE0ENBrW3n3fLgw1MNCC8kIhKXkO54Ma9FWniz9p_9QvOCQMzcGsFVJRRWPxFAhbA*24%26data%3D04*7C01*7CBailey*40access-board.gov*7Ca046c1f232db4435790408d8f2bc0eb4*7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9*7C0*7C0*7C637526236811861875*7CUnknown*7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0*3D*7C1000%26sdata%3D*2BZUziQbEDfKn44WfA1TVBdEkuvGDGcSybdPz8VIl3hg*3D%26reserved%3D0__%3BJSUlJSUlJSUlKiUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSU!!GqivPVa7Brio!KVej9JLDnkm0LMrpz5A2mkcszWJnLbsbyaUluDEsjwg8GRqXB249_qoxJdpjqTujhgE%24&data=04%7C01%7CBailey%40access-board.gov%7Ce886b4f8bb1c413c04ce08d8f48fed1e%7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9%7C0%7C1%7C637528246291794951%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=O%2B0MjH60qLt3OlF3%2BUB7XK8sIbkYSg167aZH7zuo5Jw%3D&reserved=0>>
>     >> Please add any that we missed.
>     >>
>     >> Thanks,
>     >> ~Shawn
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> [1]
>     >> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>     >> Subject: Accessibility icon set - finalizing
>     >> Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 16:52:11 -0500
>     >> From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org <mailto:shawn@w3.org> <mailto:shawn@w3.org <mailto:shawn@w3.org>>>
>     >> To: WAI Coordination Call <public-wai-cc@w3.org <mailto:public-wai-cc@w3.org> <mailto:public-wai-cc@w3.org <mailto:public-wai-cc@w3.org>>>
>     >>
>     >> Hiya,
>     >>
>     >> EOWG has been polishing a set of icons. The final icons are here:
>     >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.w3.org/WAI/teach-advocate/accessibility-icon-set__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!NJNE0ENBrW3n3fLgw1MNCC8kIhKXkO54Ma9FWniz9p_9QvOCQMzcGsFVJRRWZeG1Yso$ <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.com%2Fv3%2F__https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2Fteach-advocate%2Faccessibility-icon-set__%3B!!GqivPVa7Brio!NJNE0ENBrW3n3fLgw1MNCC8kIhKXkO54Ma9FWniz9p_9QvOCQMzcGsFVJRRWZeG1Yso%24&data=04%7C01%7CBailey%40access-board.gov%7Ce886b4f8bb1c413c04ce08d8f48fed1e%7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9%7C0%7C1%7C637528246291799942%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=4qc0GRVmOJ%2BIarbesXDxtd78L1cOba%2Fyr0RMSFC1oM4%3D&reserved=0> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*2Furldefense.com*2Fv3*2F__https*3A*2Fwww.w3.org*2FWAI*2Fteach-advocate*2Faccessibility-icon-set__*3B!!GqivPVa7Brio!NJNE0ENBrW3n3fLgw1MNCC8kIhKXkO54Ma9FWniz9p_9QvOCQMzcGsFVJRRWZeG1Yso*24&data=04*7C01*7CBailey*40access-board.gov*7Ca046c1f232db4435790408d8f2bc0eb4*7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9*7C0*7C0*7C637526236811866866*7CUnknown*7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0*3D*7C1000&sdata=y*2Fnpogwk*2B49bMZZKtUWGLEbGQ9m1B*2Bw1qOwrPs3y8tA*3D&reserved=0__;JSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJQ!!GqivPVa7Brio!KVej9JLDnkm0LMrpz5A2mkcszWJnLbsbyaUluDEsjwg8GRqXB249_qoxJdpj7802nvU$ <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.com%2Fv3%2F__https%3A%2Fnam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com%2F%3Furl%3Dhttps*3A*2F*2Furldefense.com*2Fv3*2F__https*3A*2Fwww.w3.org*2FWAI*2Fteach-advocate*2Faccessibility-icon-set__*3B!!GqivPVa7Brio!NJNE0ENBrW3n3fLgw1MNCC8kIhKXkO54Ma9FWniz9p_9QvOCQMzcGsFVJRRWZeG1Yso*24%26data%3D04*7C01*7CBailey*40access-board.gov*7Ca046c1f232db4435790408d8f2bc0eb4*7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9*7C0*7C0*7C637526236811866866*7CUnknown*7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0*3D*7C1000%26sdata%3Dy*2Fnpogwk*2B49bMZZKtUWGLEbGQ9m1B*2Bw1qOwrPs3y8tA*3D%26reserved%3D0__%3BJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJQ!!GqivPVa7Brio!KVej9JLDnkm0LMrpz5A2mkcszWJnLbsbyaUluDEsjwg8GRqXB249_qoxJdpj7802nvU%24&data=04%7C01%7CBailey%40access-board.gov%7Ce886b4f8bb1c413c04ce08d8f48fed1e%7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9%7C0%7C1%7C637528246291804937%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=5QjMZt1z72RafNgDumrWfgvTBAlIXb%2FaGT2%2BAj9x6qs%3D&reserved=0>>
>     >>
>     >> (If you're curious, some Background is herehttps://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.w3.org/WAI/teach-advocate/accessibility-icon-set-review__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!NJNE0ENBrW3n3fLgw1MNCC8kIhKXkO54Ma9FWniz9p_9QvOCQMzcGsFVJRRW1D6MJG4$ <herehttps://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.w3.org/WAI/teach-advocate/accessibility-icon-set-review__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!NJNE0ENBrW3n3fLgw1MNCC8kIhKXkO54Ma9FWniz9p_9QvOCQMzcGsFVJRRW1D6MJG4$><https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*2Furldefense.com*2Fv3*2F__https*3A*2Fwww.w3.org*2FWAI*2Fteach-advocate*2Faccessibility-icon-set-review__*3B!!GqivPVa7Brio!NJNE0ENBrW3n3fLgw1MNCC8kIhKXkO54Ma9FWniz9p_9QvOCQMzcGsFVJRRW1D6MJG4*24&data=04*7C01*7CBailey*40access-board.gov*7Ca046c1f232db4435790408d8f2bc0eb4*7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9*7C0*7C0*7C637526236811871861*7CUnknown*7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0*3D*7C1000&sdata=bSTjFp1P4vz0aPGd*2BKXLp*2FQ9Z6i5SEVdw9JMwy3u*2FbQ*3D&reserved=0__;JSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJQ!!GqivPVa7Brio!KVej9JLDnkm0LMrpz5A2mkcszWJnLbsbyaUluDEsjwg8GRqXB249_qoxJdpjqKIQz0A$ <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.com%2Fv3%2F__https%3A%2Fnam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com%2F%3Furl%3Dhttps*3A*2F*2Furldefense.com*2Fv3*2F__https*3A*2Fwww.w3.org*2FWAI*2Fteach-advocate*2Faccessibility-icon-set-review__*3B!!GqivPVa7Brio!NJNE0ENBrW3n3fLgw1MNCC8kIhKXkO54Ma9FWniz9p_9QvOCQMzcGsFVJRRW1D6MJG4*24%26data%3D04*7C01*7CBailey*40access-board.gov*7Ca046c1f232db4435790408d8f2bc0eb4*7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9*7C0*7C0*7C637526236811871861*7CUnknown*7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0*3D*7C1000%26sdata%3DbSTjFp1P4vz0aPGd*2BKXLp*2FQ9Z6i5SEVdw9JMwy3u*2FbQ*3D%26reserved%3D0__%3BJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJQ!!GqivPVa7Brio!KVej9JLDnkm0LMrpz5A2mkcszWJnLbsbyaUluDEsjwg8GRqXB249_qoxJdpjqKIQz0A%24&data=04%7C01%7CBailey%40access-board.gov%7Ce886b4f8bb1c413c04ce08d8f48fed1e%7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9%7C0%7C1%7C637528246291809930%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=mi%2BgrB1zBvvBci%2BmLT2%2Fud1GwUFODBcv2Q3BBRfbo2E%3D&reserved=0>> )
>     >>
>     >> We are now polishing the SVG (and that page) and will provide the icons in multiple versions -- formats, sizes, colors.
>     >>
>     >> Please let me know by Wednesday 7 October if you have any concerns or input.
>     >>
>     >> Best,
>     >> ~Shawn
>     >>
>     >
Attachments

text/html attachment: stored
image/png attachment: Screen_Shot_2021-03-31_at_4.22.02_PM.png
Received on Thursday, 1 April 2021 00:17:53 UTC