- From: Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>
- Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 12:19:58 -0500
- To: public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>, Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com>
- Message-ID: <CA+=z1W==D-VNA=dB_mAEUFND9MMGMqpwT-iU7fgtYM8dsEoKgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi LVTF, We have a request for thoughts. let's respond to the list. Jim ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com> Date: Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 4:48 AM Subject: Custom stylesheet question for LVTF To: <jimallan@tsbvi.edu> Hey Jim, The ACT-Rules community group had a question we wanted to get input on from the LVTF, I wasn't sure what channel to use to communicate. Please let me know if I need to go somewhere else for this. The question is about custom stylesheets and as to whether or not code like this is a problem: <div role="list"> <li>Some content</li> </div> WCAG is a little vague on what should and shouldn't be expected from someone using custom stylesheets. I know tools like Stylish are relatively popular still to tweak the styles of a website, but it's pretty complicated to write a good custom stylesheet, especially if you want to make a robust one, which is where the above example comes in. So our question breaks down into two; 1. How important does LVTF think custom stylesheets are, given how complex things have gotten To what extent does LVTF think page styles need to be configurable? How far does 1.3.1 go? I would expect it to include things like allowing changes at the element level, like tweaking font size, color, borders, spacing, etc. But what about more complex things like changing the layout of a menu, or to customise the style of a list? 2. What level of effort is reasonable to expect from someone using a custom stylesheet? If I with my custom stylesheet want to make sure all lists are marked up a certain way, is it reasonable to expect all lists to follow the HTML spec, or should the author of the custom stylesheet be expected to create a robust custom stylesheet which tries to anticipate odd uses of ul, ol and li elements? For the example above, where ARIA is used in combination with a native HTML element, this is a programatically determined relationship, but it's invalid HTML; li elements must be contained in a ul, ol or menu element. I suspect this passes SC 1.3.1, but I don't think it is particularly reasonable to expect the author of a custom stylesheet to anticipate all the odd ways ARIA can interact with native elements. So, long story, sorry about that, but it's a complicated question. I hope my explanation of it is clear enough. Please do ask if this needs further elaboration, or if I need to send this somewhere else. Thanks for our time, -- *Wilco Fiers* Axe for Web product owner - Co-facilitator WCAG-ACT - Chair ACT-R -- TSBVI Need assistance? Click this link for help: MOJO HELP DESK <https://tsbvi.mojohelpdesk.com/mytickets/create#/ticket-form-selection> Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired 1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756 voice 512.206.9315 fax: 512.206.9452 http://www.tsbvi.edu/ "We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: deque_logo_180p.gif
Received on Wednesday, 22 April 2020 17:20:23 UTC