- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:34:07 +0000
- To: Andrew Somers <me@andysomers.com>
- CC: 'public-low-vision-a11y-tf' <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <DBBPR09MB304561C7D27904889D869AFCB9920@DBBPR09MB3045.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Andrew, For images in emails, I suggest putting in a link to that image on your website (or a website), as a secondary method for people to see it. For LVTF email the images do get stripped, on the AG list they get included at the bottom, I don't know why it's different! Also, I think the special frequency aspect might provide guidance for a question I have about the new focus indicator SC. We're currently setting the minimum bar at: * A change in contrast of at least 3:1. * A size in CSS pixels that is at least 1px multiplied by the longest edge. * If the indicator it doesn't contrast with the adjacent color, it should be at least 2px thick. E.g. these [1] pass, default then focused: [cid:image002.jpg@01D5840D.39D884B0] [cid:image008.jpg@01D5840D.39D884B0] [cid:image010.jpg@01D5840D.39D884B0] [cid:image012.jpg@01D5840D.39D884B0] [cid:image013.jpg@01D5840D.39D884B0] These fail: [cid:image015.jpg@01D5840D.39D884B0](1px increase next to a non-contrasting color) [cid:image022.jpg@01D5840D.39D884B0](light grey replaces white) The problem is that this [2] also passes: [cid:image025.jpg@01D5840D.39D884B0] In terms of ratcheting up the requirement, my impression is that it would make more sense to increase the surface area than the contrast requirement. E.g. A size in CSS pixels that is at least 2px multiplied by the longest edge So this would pass: [cid:image028.png@01D5840D.39D884B0] With a 2px thickness line. Whereas increasing the contrast to 4.5:1 wouldn't make as much difference? Cheers, -Alastair 1] https://alastairc.uk/tests/wcag22-examples/focus-more-visible-2.html <https://alastairc.uk/tests/wcag22-examples/focus-more-visible-2.html%20%0d2> 2<https://alastairc.uk/tests/wcag22-examples/focus-more-visible-2.html%20%0d2>] http://3needs.org/en/testing/code/focus-visibility.html From: Andrew Somers <me@andysomers.com> Sent: 11 October 2019 05:28 To: Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>; Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>; Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>; Shawn Lauriat <lauriat@google.com>; Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>; jjuett@salesforce.com Cc: public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org> Subject: One Simple Infographic that explains Spatial Frequency Hello everyone, I am endeavoring to write shorter emails! Here is a simple infographic: [cid:image003.png@01D58408.43CE8370] Assuming a standard viewer distance (CSS reference pixel visual angle): * a stroke width of between 8px to 20px is at the peak of contrast sensitivity, while * a 1px stroke width drops contrast perception down an order of magnatude x2 from peak. * Increasing stroke width (by increasing font size and/or font weight) increases perceived contrast * especially closer to threshold, and * especially at the higher frequencies (over 16cpd). * impairments offset this curve, typically down and to the left. * The implication is that impairments come closer to threshold sooner, and need additional contrast Please let me know if there are questions/comments. I do have one question: is there a way to save graphics/attachments for emails to the list archive? I see they are always stripped? Perhaps I should just double post them to the Wiki? Thank you!! Andy Andrew Somers Address Redacted for List
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2019 09:34:14 UTC