Re: Issue resolution - Change to normative text of 1.4.12: at least > up to #637

The LVTF discussed this issue at length.
https://www.w3.org/2019/07/25-lvtf-minutes.html

>
> So the questions are:
>
>    - Do you agree with the change to the normative SC text? (yes/no)
>
> No

>
>    -
>    - If not, can it be dealt with in the understanding document? (yes/no)
>
> Yes

>
>    -
>    - If it can be dealt with in the understanding doc, what would the
>    change be? (A work item, could be done by someone else.)
>
> LVTF Resolution <https://www.w3.org/2019/07/25-lvtf-minutes.html> from
July 25, 2019 meeting:
RESOLUTION: leave current 1.4.12 SC test as "at least" ... Change the
understanding document for 1.4.12 and LVTF will update the doc.

>
>    -
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
>
>
> 1] https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/635
>
> 2] https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/635#issuecomment-513362895
>
> 3] https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Understanding/text-spacing.html
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> www.nomensa.com / @alastc
>
>

-- 
Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator
Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired
1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756
voice 512.206.9315    fax: 512.206.9452 http://www.tsbvi.edu/
"We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964