- From: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 18:51:31 +0000
- To: Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>, public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BN6PR03MB3139696D9A77F88257D52EE5F1240@BN6PR03MB3139.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Wayne, I was thinking of something under the section for 1.4.10. I would say something like Some authors may use different CSS with varying fonts sizes at different breakpoints to support responsive sites that reflow at 320 CSS pixels. Authors must consider that using smaller font sizes in these variations may reduce the size of text below the default font size thus making the text difficult or impossible for some users to read. Thus, consideration should be given to the readability of content at viewport widths of 320 CSS pixels or more. Jon Jonathan Avila Chief Accessibility Officer Level Access jon.avila@levelaccess.com<mailto:jon.avila@levelaccess.com> 703.637.8957 office Visit us online: Website<http://www.levelaccess.com/> | Twitter<https://twitter.com/LevelAccessA11y> | Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/LevelAccessA11y/> | LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/company/level-access> | Blog<http://www.levelaccess.com/blog/> [The State of Digital Accessibility 2019 report is here! Download the report today to read the findings. Level Access]<https://levelaccess.com/state-of-digital-accessibility-2019> The information contained in this transmission may be attorney privileged and/or confidential information intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. From: Wayne Dick [mailto:wayneedick@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 2:23 PM To: public-low-vision-a11y-tf Subject: Re: Understand1410 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. OOPs something popped me out of edit and sent my message. Dear Group, I appended the following language to the section The relation of Reflow to the Success Criterion 1.4..<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Wlc7jf503T1E4VVZJI43YcwIP6rwyGeQU_iwzswToco/edit#bookmark=id.wwale83llswz> You should not reduce font size for limited viewport space to make reflow possible. This may make reading impossible for your audience. If you were to reduce 16px print to 8px so that at 400% you would still get 200% enlargement, then you would subject users with limited visual field to 8px (6pt) font - an unusable font for reading. This would pass 1.4.4 but it would exclude people with limited visual field from reading. Best, Wayne On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 11:15 AM Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com<mailto:wayneedick@gmail.com>> wrote: Dear Group, I appended the following language to the section The relation of Reflow to the Success Criterion 1.4..<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Wlc7jf503T1E4VVZJI43YcwIP6rwyGeQU_iwzswToco/edit#bookmark=id.wwale83llswz> The relation of Reflow to the Success Criterion 1.4..<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Wlc7jf503T1E4VVZJI43YcwIP6rwyGeQU_iwzswToco/edit#bookmark=id.wwale83llswz> On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 11:17 PM Wayne Dick (via Google Docs) <wayneedick@gmail.com<mailto:wayneedick@gmail.com>> wrote: wayneedick@gmail.com<mailto:wayneedick@gmail.com> has shared a link to the following document: [https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/documents/share/images/services/document-4.png] Understand1410<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Wlc7jf503T1E4VVZJI43YcwIP6rwyGeQU_iwzswToco/edit?usp=sharing_eil&ts=5cb421e9> [Unknown profile photo]I gave a local TOC for convenience. Also starred sections have been changed. The first section is altered quite a bit. However most of the changes are to include the new disability group, people with limited visual field. This required a rearrangement of many paragraphs. No substantive change was intended. The section on 1.4.4 is reworked. With an example of how authors can prevent zoom to 200%. Example 2 was added to show when shrinking text is OK. I changed the reference from my web page to the official refereed publication. Thats all, Wayne Open in Docs<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Wlc7jf503T1E4VVZJI43YcwIP6rwyGeQU_iwzswToco/edit?usp=sharing_eip&ts=5cb421e9> Google Docs: Create and edit documents online. Google LLC, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA You have received this email because someone shared a document with you from Google Docs. [Logo for Google Docs]<https://drive.google.com>
Attachments
- image/jpeg attachment: image001.jpg
Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2019 18:51:56 UTC