Anything for a possible 2.2?

Hi Jim (and LVTF),

Pre-TPAC, it would be useful to know if there are any potential SCs you’d consider for a WCAG 2.2?

We haven’t determined whether the group will tackle that yet, but part of the decision would be: Is it useful to do a 2.2?

Looking back, I couldn’t see much in the LVTF ‘defer’ list here:
https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue+label%3ALVTF+label%3ADefer+


Printing customised text perhaps?

Given the shape of 2.1 now, are there gaps or things to tighten up that can work in the 2.x structure?
Perhaps a couple of additional SCs that tighten up current ones?

If there are others that didn’t make it to a github issue in the first place, now is the time to say so.

I’m not sure who’s attending TPAC, but if there’s a short overview of 1-6 SCs I can run through them which would be very useful for the discussion.

Kind regards,

-Alastair

--

www.nomensa.com<http://www.nomensa.com/>
tel: +44 (0)117 929 7333 / 07970 879 653
follow us: @we_are_nomensa or me: @alastc
Nomensa Ltd. King William House, 13 Queen Square, Bristol BS1 4NT

Company number: 4214477 | UK VAT registration: GB 771727411