RE: I am lost reading techniques

Hi Wayne,

We do try to have links to the ‘rendered’ versions, usually at the top of each pull request.

For example, using the labels in Github, this is the list of techniques awaiting initial review:
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22Ready+for+initial+review%22


Then going to one of interest (role of img on icon fonts) goes to the discussion page:
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/531


And the first line includes a link to the preview:
https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/w3c/wcag/blob/tech-icon-font-img-role/techniques/aria/icon-font-img-role.html


I’m going to talk to Michael about how we could add basic CSS to make it easier to read, but it’s something you’d probably over-ride anyway!

Does that help,  or was it another aspect?

-Alastair


From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Sent: 14 November 2018 09:16
To: Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>
Cc: public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>; Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>; Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
Subject: Re: I am lost reading techniques

Hi Wayne,

Hey, absolutely no need for you to feel stupid. I "think" that the tool that had previously been used to render GitHub HTML changed. The AG chairs post a link to new  techniques in that new rendering tool when techiques are surveyed. I think that they also try to put the link in the cooseponding GitHub issue but those links may be more difficult to locate.

Alastair and Andrew, is there an easy way to find the HTML rendered version of proposed techniques?

Thank you.

Kindest Regards,

Laura

On Tue, Nov 13, 2018, 6:56 PM Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com<mailto:wayneedick@gmail.com> wrote:
As I read the AG list I see all these references to techniques. When I try to read them they are just git code files. How can I get the text and code for a technique at random that I can read? I really feel stupid.

Best, Wayne