Re: Infographics

+1 to what Jim reported.  If we use these as examples..we will need to fix
some of the colors.  Doable..but not passing yet.

Another thing to consider...the dear folks at MicroAssist could be a source
of examples.  I just found this one which I think would pass as is:
https://www.microassist.com/curriculum-development/examples-of-our-work/#nimblebox[nimble_portfolio_gal_pro]/0/

And this one...which is close..I don't think the red and blue are different
enough...but we could solve that (or Alastair..maybe you think where the
red line and blue line cross is not critical for color distinction?)
https://www.microassist.com/curriculum-development/examples-of-our-work/#nimblebox[nimble_portfolio_gal_pro]/3/

G

glenda sims  |   team a11y lead   |    deque.com    |    512.963.3773
*web for everyone. web on everything.* -  w3 goals

[image: IAAP International Association of Accessibility Professionals:
Certified Professional in Accessibility Core Competencies (CPACC)]
<http://www.accessibilityassociation.org/certification>




On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 4:41 PM, Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu> wrote:

> see below
>
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 5:59 AM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I just found a ton of (mostly passing?) infographics here:
>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/gdsdigital/
>>
>> The copyright license is to allow sharing & reuse with attribution, so
>> it's a reasonable source for testing or publications so long as it's
>> attributed.
>>
>> It would be useful for a few people to look at a few and assess whether
>> they think they would pass non-text-contrast, but also:
>> - relying on colour
>> - text (in graphics) contrast
>>
>> Most infographics I've found fail one of the current WCAG 2.0 ones,
>> adding non-text-contrast isn't that big a deal overall.
>>
>> As a starter selection:
>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/gdsdigital/4729221809/in/datetaken/
>
> ​blue circle and yellow-green circle - fail
> white circle and yellow-green circle - fail​
>
> ​text covers the meaning of the graphics that fail. tho there are text
> contrast failures. ​
>
>
>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/gdsdigital/4719771789/in/datetaken/
>
> ​pink and green​
>
> ​- fail
> lite green and dark green - fail​
> the text has the meaningful information.  but it fail text contrast
>
>>
>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/gdsdigital/4645105776/in/datetaken/
>
> ​beige and white - fail​
> light beige and dark beige - fail
> there is enough meaninful text near the failing graphics that the graphics
> are redundant
>
> is this what you want?
>
>
>>
>> -Alastair
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator
> Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired
> 1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+W.+45th+St.,+Austin,+Texas+78756&entry=gmail&source=g>
> voice 512.206.9315 <(512)%20206-9315>    fax: 512.206.9452
> <(512)%20206-9452> http://www.tsbvi.edu/
> "We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964
>

Received on Thursday, 22 February 2018 20:58:31 UTC