- From: Erich Manser <emanser@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 12:01:19 -0400
- To: public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <OFD3E69A6D.9427555E-ON852581C5.0057DE1A-852581C5.00580301@notes.na.collabserv.c>
Minutes pasted below and at link:
http://www.w3.org/2017/10/26-lvtf-minutes.html
Low Vision Accessibility Task Force Teleconference
26 Oct 2017
See also: IRC log
Attendees
Present
Shawn, Jim, JohnRochford, ScottM, Erich, Laura, SteveRep, steve
Regrets
Glenda, Alastair
Chair
SV_MEETING_CHAIR
Scribe
erich
Contents
Topics
techniques for 1.4.10, 1.4.13, 1.4.14
Review Hover Understanding
techniques for 1.4.10, 1.4.13, 1.4.14
Summary of Action Items
Summary of Resolutions
<allanj>
http://blog.freedomscientific.com/2017/10/25/important-information-for-users-of-mozilla-firefox/
<shawn> :-)
test
<scribe> Scribe: erich
techniques for 1.4.10, 1.4.13, 1.4.14
<laura> Proposed WCAG 2.1 SC Techniques:
https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Proposed_WCAG_2.1_SC_Techniques
<laura> Allowing for Spacing Override:
https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Allowing_for_Spacing_Override
<allanj> Jim will add review techniques to next week agenda
Review Hover Understanding
<laura> Understanding Content on Hover or Focus:
https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/content-on-hover-or-focus/understanding/21/content-on-hover-or-focus.html
<laura> All of the understanding docs are linked from:
https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Accepted_WCAG_2.1_SC
SR: I broke up the 3 different conditions. SC has morphed from original.
... Components portion was removed, seemingly for overlap with 2.1.1
... Would like to propose a change to make things clearer
... Second bullet about Hover can stay the same, but would propose changing
to make the new content Hoverable
... Also on last bullet, propose removing bit about focus and make it about
persistence to reduce overlap with 2.1.1
JA: Suggests adding pictures
SR: Plans to use tool-tip example and another example with larger target
and other with content over the top of it
<allanj>
https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Metadata_On_Hover
<allanj>
https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Metadata_On_Hover#Div_on_Hover_Obscuring_Content_Example
JA: any specific websites as bad examples?
SR: Suggests gmail as possible example of tooltips that are not hoverable
JA: Suggests taking offline following the AG call
<allanj> jim - review Understanding Hover next week
techniques for 1.4.10, 1.4.13, 1.4.14
<allanj> close item 1
<allanj> close item 2
<allanj> At least 5 conforming Web sites 1 are available, of which
<allanj> At least four conform at level AA,
<allanj> At least one conforms at level AAA
JA: For conformance testing, AG would like at least 5 conforming websites,
of which 4 are AA and at least 1 AAA
... Anyone know of any AAA conformant websites?
LC: Lainey Feingold's website
<shawn> AAA http://www.lflegal.com/
<allanj> At least two implementations 2 exist for each success criterion
added in WCAG 2.1 (Success Criteria from WCAG 2.0 do not need new
implementations);
<allanj> Accessibility support documentation for SC with platform/user
agent/assistive technology dependencies is available for at least two
technologies with at least four platforms (operating system/user
agent/assistive technology combinations
JA: Wonder if SVG counts, or considered part of HTML
<laura> CR Exit Criteria from Tuesday’s AG meeting:
https://www.w3.org/2017/10/24-ag-minutes.html#item05
<allanj> All sufficient techniques listed in Understanding WCAG 2.0 at the
end of the Candidate Recommendation period contain test procedures
<laura> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Allowing_for_Spacing_Override
<laura> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Allowing_for_Spacing_Override#Tests
<allanj> The Working Group has responded formally to all issues raised
against this document related to any implementation efforts during the
Candidate Recommendation period.
<laura> Open 2.1 GitHub Issues Labeled "LVTF”:
https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/labels/LVTF
JA: AG group has been voting on proposed responses, I will include some in
next week's agenda
... Who will be at TPAC?
<allanj> Shawn, Scott, Glenda, Alastair
SM: I may go, believe it's in San Francisco
JA: Glenda and Alastair will go
SR: Will join virtually as much as I can
LC: Same for me
<allanj> there will also be phone bridge available. Jim, Laura, Steve on
phone
<allanj> http://www.tsbvi.edu/understanding%20zoom.html
JA: Would like to emphasize the evils of horizontal scrolling in the intent
<allanj> make sure Wayne;s article is in the resources section
JA: I added another picture and may include some of Wayne's graphics in
there to help illustrate
... Are there other features others can think of to help illustrate for
Zoom Content?
... Unable to locate any comparison numbers on low-vision magnification vs.
screen-reader users
<shawn> Scrolling http://www.tader.info/scrolling.html To see Comments,
click the "Show" button
<shawn> "I am currently using Zoomtext at 4x magnification and moving the
screen back and forth to read a long sentence makes me nauseous/sea-sick."
<shawn> "Magnification disorients me and makes it worse. I use very large
print and zoom in with web browsers instead."
<shawn> How important is it to be able to change the following:... No
horizontal scrolling -- Very important 65%; Important 22%
<shawn> "People who use screen magnification I've user-tested sites with
have been very much hindered by having to horizontally scroll in magnified
views"
<allanj> caveat web aim demographics not representative to VI
population ... WHO data
JA: Ending to go to AG meeting. Will have Steve and Understanding Zoom on
agenda for next week
<laura> bye
Summary of Action Items
Summary of Resolutions
[End of minutes]
Erich Manser
IBM
Accessibility,
IBM Research
Littleton,
MA / tel:
978-696-1810
Search for
accessibility
answers
You don't need eyesight to have vision.
Attachments
- image/jpeg attachment: 1A562701.jpg
- image/jpeg attachment: 1A584037.jpg
- image/gif attachment: ecblank.gif
- image/gif attachment: 1A772825.gif
Received on Thursday, 26 October 2017 16:02:05 UTC