- From: Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 11:19:03 -0500
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>, public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAH2ngEQbTOhBSHatkRkVLmgsAHSf1s1W14Sq0f8Qq_sP+nVeCg@mail.gmail.com>
+1 (and thanks Alastair for all you do to keep so many balls moving forward) G glenda sims | team a11y lead | deque.com | 512.963.3773 *web for everyone. web on everything.* - w3 goals On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > After a fairly epic twitter conversation with Patrick, we came to the > conclusion it should be a failure of 4.1.2, which can be added by having a > technique (and/or failure). It would then help to publicise this ‘change’, > if there is any associated LV documentation that goes up around the time of > 2.1… > > > > This is the thread (linking towards the end): > > https://twitter.com/patrick_h_lauke/status/864490963879723008 > > > > Assuming people agree, where could we track this as a to-do item? > > > > Cheers, > > > > -Alastair > > > > > > *From: *"Repsher, Stephen J" <stephen.j.repsher@boeing.com> > *Date: *Thursday, 11 May 2017 at 18:31 > *To: *Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com>, 'Jim Allan' < > jimallan@tsbvi.edu>, LVTF - low-vision-a11y <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3. > org>, 'Glenda Sims' <glenda.sims@deque.com> > *Subject: *RE: Icon fonts - semantic elements > *Resent-From: *LVTF - low-vision-a11y <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org> > *Resent-Date: *Thursday, 11 May 2017 at 18:32 > > > > Yes, I was going to say the same thing as Katie. The definition is: > > > > user interface component > > a part of the content that is perceived by users as a single control for a > distinct function > > > > There’s certainly a deficiency here because ARIA can change the native > role to various types that wouldn’t be considered UI components, such as > “img” for icon fonts or sprites. I’d also question whether role=”toolbar” > or other container roles are covered here. > > > > Furthermore, if an icon is used as a UI component like a button for > example, then 4.1.2 may only require you use <button> or role=”button” and > give it a label, but then we’re back to the same problem when it comes to > font replacement. > > > > Steve > > > > *From:* Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL [mailto:ryladog@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, May 11, 2017 1:07 PM > *To:* 'Jim Allan' <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>; 'public-low-vision-a11y-tf' < > public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>; Repsher, Stephen J < > stephen.j.repsher@boeing.com>; 'Glenda Sims' <glenda.sims@deque.com> > *Subject:* RE: Icon fonts - semantic elements > > > > Jim, > > > > In my mind only if that icon font was used as a *control*. 4.1.2 is > really about interactive elements….my 2 cents… > > > > ** katie ** > > > > *Katie Haritos-Shea* > *Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)* > > > > *Cell: 703-371-5545 <(703)%20371-5545> **|* *ryladog@gmail.com* > <ryladog@gmail.com> *|* *Oakton, VA **|* *LinkedIn Profile* > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/katieharitosshea/> *|* *Office: 703-371-5545 > <(703)%20371-5545> **|* *@ryladog* <https://twitter.com/Ryladog> > > NOTE: The content of this email should be construed to always be an > expression of my own personal independent opinion, unless I identify that I > am speaking on behalf of Knowbility, as their AC Rep at the W3C - and - > that my personal email never expresses the opinion of my employer, Deque > Systems. > > > > *From:* Jim Allan [mailto:jimallan@tsbvi.edu <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>] > *Sent:* Thursday, May 11, 2017 12:56 PM > *To:* public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>; > Repsher, Stephen J <stephen.j.repsher@boeing.com>; Glenda Sims < > glenda.sims@deque.com> > *Subject:* Icon fonts - semantic elements > > > > Was drafting the email to html editor about where to file a but about > specifying the semantic of sprites or icon-fonts so they can be > programmatically determined. > > "role" popped into my head. > > How is using <i>some icon-font stuff</i> not a failure of > > *4.1.2 Name, Role, Value:* For all user interface components > <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#user-interface-componentdef> (including > but not limited to: form elements, links and components generated by > scripts), the name <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#namedef> and role > <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#roledef> can be programmatically determined > <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#programmaticallydetermineddef>; states, > properties, and values that can be set by the user can be programmatically > set <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#programmaticallysetdef>; and > notification of changes to these items is available to user agents > <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#useragentdef>, including assistive > technologies <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#atdef>. (Level A) > > > > the icon-font is text but its role is an image shouldn't this fail 4.1.2? > > > > > > -- > > Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator > > Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired > 1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756 > voice 512.206.9315 <(512)%20206-9315> fax: 512.206.9264 > <(512)%20206-9264> http://www.tsbvi.edu/ > > "We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964 >
Received on Tuesday, 16 May 2017 16:19:38 UTC