- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 13:18:32 -0500
- To: public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>, GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Hi again, You can get to the new comment form on the SC without wading through all 140+ comments at: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/78#new_comment_field The 2 proposals under consideration are at: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/78#issuecomment-289434649 Results so far: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Consensus_Tally_for_Adapting_Text_SC_Text Kindest Regards, Laura On 3/27/17, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello everyone. > > We have had considerable discussion (140 comments to date) on the > Adapting Text SC, Issue 78. > > Currently we are attempting to ascertain if we can get consensus on > one point. It is whether to use "A mechanism is available" language in > the SC text or not. > > Two proposals are under consideration [1]. In a GitHub comment on > Issue 78, please let us know if you cannot live with: > > * Proposal A > * Proposal B > > If you have a preference, please let us know that too. I am tracking > results in the Consensus Tally for Adapting Text SC Text Wiki page > [2]. > > Thank you. > > Kindest Regards, > Laura > > [1] https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/78#issuecomment-289434649 > [2] > https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Consensus_Tally_for_Adapting_Text_SC_Text > > -- > Laura L. Carlson > -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Monday, 27 March 2017 18:19:19 UTC