- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 13:46:20 -0500
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Hi Alastair and all, I noticed that Andrew's spreadsheet [1] currently has question marks for the adaptable text SC for: * Testable * Condition not method * implementable Kindest Regards, Laura [1] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.1_SC_status On 3/22/17, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Alastair, > > I certainly missed you too! > > Yes, we had a lot of push back to drop specific values for font and > color on the call. I don't know how we will be able to test it without > values but Wayne said it is doable is working on a solution. > > I personally would not want the “mechanism” language as it inevitably > leads to the exhausting widget discussion. However, Andrew has that > language in his rewrite and folks on the call seemed like it. > > Jim put the adapting-text SC on Thursday's LVTF agenda so we can > discuss the assumptions you asked about. Hope you can attend the > meeting. > > In addition, I hope to reply to the GitHub comments after the LVTF has > had a chance to discuss all this. > > Thank you for all of your help! > > Kindest Regards, > Laura > > > On 3/22/17, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: >> HI Laura, >> >> I missed most of the good bits of the call yesterday, but I noticed that >> JF, >> MichaelC and others were supportive of dropping the specific values for >> font >> & colour? >> >> I’d be happy with that, but there would be some objections to over-rule >> as >> it is either there or not, I don’t see a compromise position. >> >> The “mechanism” language does lead people to think it requires a widget. >> Is >> this what we want? >> >> For the LVTF, there are a couple of assumption it would be good to get >> agreement on, and the first is: >> >> If the styles of a site prevent you from usefully adapting text, would >> you >> want a widget on the site to enable that? >> >> I’ve been leaning towards ‘no’, as if people provide a widget, it will be >> based on their colours/fonts rather than the ones you want. >> >> Also, I think we had changed the SC so that it works in a PDF context as >> well, is that correct? >> >> I have replied on github, but I wanted to check my assumptions! >> >> Thanks, >> >> -Alastair >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Laura L. Carlson > -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Wednesday, 22 March 2017 18:46:53 UTC