- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 09:42:22 -0500
- To: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com>
- Cc: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>, Amani Ali <aali@nomensa.com>
Hi Jonathan and all, I updated the spreadsheet to use the word "viewport" and deleted the resolution column. Thanks. For testing with VIP PDF-Reader, we will probably need to find measurement tools. Here are a couple: A Ruler For Windows http://www.arulerforwindows.com/ Free Ruler is a free screen ruler for Mac OS X. http://www.pascal.com/software/freeruler/ Anyone have recommendations? We also need more PDFs to test. Is there anything like Alexa for PDFs? Thanks. Kindest Regards, Laura On 7/27/17, Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com> wrote: > Yes for web content we should use viewport and drop resolution. I wonder > though for PDF readers how we can measure that. > > Jon > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Jul 27, 2017, at 10:00 AM, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Alastair and Jon, >> >> Thanks, Alastair. >> >> Jon, are you okay with us changing “Window size” to “Viewport size”, >> and dropping the display resolution column on the spreadsheet? In the >> Github issue you had mentioned that we should, "note the screen >> resolution used as well when zoom is used." [1] >> >> Kindest Regards, >> Laura >> >> [1] https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/78#issuecomment-317840594 >> >>> On 7/27/17, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: >>> Hi Laura, >>> >>> I think “Window size” should be “Viewport size”, and we can drop the >>> display >>> resolution column. >>> >>> For you (and Amani) on a Mac they are the same thing, anyone testing on >>> windows should resize their window until the width is reported as 1280px >>> in >>> the inspector (for the HTML element). >>> >>> If you are on a display larger than 1280, I suggest using something like >>> the >>> webdev toolbar to resize the window, you can put in custom sizes to >>> that. >>> >>> To note, Amani has tested the Alexa top 50 [1], and is adding some >>> ‘smaller’ >>> sites so we don’t have a sample completely skewed to large properties. >>> >>> So far everything that fails at 400% also fails at 100% (I think, will >>> check), and that is mostly for fixed-height containers. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> -Alastair >>> >>> 1] There are a few which block the script with content-headers, but only >>> a >>> few. >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Laura L. Carlson > -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Thursday, 27 July 2017 14:42:52 UTC