Re: New Wiki page with SC text proposals to combine issues 79, 78, and 74 from Alastair Campbell on 2017-01-24 (public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org from January 2017)

From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 22:53:51 +0000
To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
CC: Gregg C Vanderheiden <greggvan@umd.edu>, GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <FD87C771-F6E9-4046-A807-2C7DDB4D56EF@nomensa.com>

I Laura,

I’m happy combining them if other people prefer that format to separate SCs.

It is the details within each bullet point that are more difficult, is it ok to have that level of specific-ness? (or “specificity”, I forget which is correct.)

Thanks,

-Alastair


On 24/01/2017, 22:39, "Laura Carlson" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi Alastair and all,
    
    Thanks you! Here is a combo version with your metrics plugged in:
    
    "No loss of content or functionality on a webpage is caused by overriding:
    * font-family to [Comic Sans], or
    * foreground and background to white on black, or
    * line-height of all text to 1.3 and spacing around elements
    containing text to 0.5em
    
    Thoughts?
    
    Kindest Regards,
    Laura

Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2017 22:54:27 UTC