Minutes: Low Vision Task Force 24 Aug 2017

source: http://www.w3.org/2017/08/24-lvtf-minutes.html
<http://www.w3.org/2017/08/24-lvtf-minutes.html>

Low Vision Accessibility Task Force Teleconference 24 Aug 2017

See also: IRC log <http://www.w3.org/2017/08/24-lvtf-irc>
Attendees
Present Jim, Shawn, JohnRochford, Erich Regrets Laura, Glenda Chair Jim
Scribe allanj
Contents

   - Topics <https://www.w3.org/2017/08/24-lvtf-minutes.html#agenda>
      1. Understanding
      https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/tree/master/understanding/21
      <https://www.w3.org/2017/08/24-lvtf-minutes.html#item01>
      2. Printing https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/76
      <https://www.w3.org/2017/08/24-lvtf-minutes.html#item02>
      3. Testing <https://www.w3.org/2017/08/24-lvtf-minutes.html#item03>
   - Summary of Action Items
   <https://www.w3.org/2017/08/24-lvtf-minutes.html#ActionSummary>
   - Summary of Resolutions
   <https://www.w3.org/2017/08/24-lvtf-minutes.html#ResolutionSummary>

------------------------------

dialin info at https://www.w3.org/2017/08/01-lvtf-info.html
Understanding https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/tree/master/understanding/21

<shawn> Jim: list of Understanding docs. Chairs decided TF should do first
pass. Would like before TPAC early Nov

<shawn> ... anyone can edit

see the rendered (non-code view) -
https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/master/understanding/21/

<shawn> ... that is list of all -- including ones that didn't get included

<shawn> JohnR: I did understanding doc a few weeks ago and it hasn't been
updated.

<shawn> Jim: Put it into here.

see the rendered (non-code view) -
https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/master/understanding/21/*short-name.html*

<shawn> These are just templates. Put content here. (some of it is
elsewhere)

see the rendered (non-code view) -
https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/master/understanding/21/adapting-text.html

<shawn> For example,
https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/master/understanding/21/adapting-text.html

<shawn> Jim: Also need to work on Techniques

<shawn> Shawn & Jim will update User Needs/Req doc as well
Printing https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/76

<shawn> Erich: Not looking good based on call and comments.

<shawn> Shawn: Theere is some support and understanding. But a lot of
misunderstandings

<shawn> Jim: Red herring (like in mystery books - throws you off course) --
not related to real issue.

<shawn> ... page size and zoom are red herrings

<shawn> Erich: Likelihood of bringing people to understanding real issues?

<shawn> Jim: Responsive print design is a known best practice

https://www.polyglotprogramminginc.com/responsive-design-and-print-styling/

https://responsivedesign.is/articles/the-printer-is-a-device-too/

<shawn> Shawn: If there are legitimate issues, I'm fine letting it drop.
But what I'm seeing is misunderstanding, not legitimate issues.
Testing

@media print {

body {

line-height: 1.5;

letter-spacing: .12em;

word-spacing: .16em;

}

p {

padding-bottom: 2em;

}

}

<shawn> Jim: Set adapted text settings. If prints, then passes.

sometimes I remove the @media and apply just to the rendered view to make
it print correctly

<shawn> Erich: Need consensus by tomorrow

author knows content, knows layout and knows whats important it should
print fine with the settings above.

the BROWSER does not know any of this.

<shawn> John: Somewhere under the impression that things that are at AAA
now could be moved to AA possibly later.

<shawn> Jim: Getting it into the document, then can tweak.

<JohnRochford__> Correction: The comment just attributed to Erich was
actually made by Jon,

+1 to getting it in at AAA

<JohnRochford__> John

NOTE: there is no requirement for testing larger fonts

<shawn> Erich: propose CSS for testing. add as AAA for this version so it
gets public input.

<shawn> Shawn: Need to clear up misunderstandings.

<shawn> Shawn: Some people understood importance but said OK to put off to
WCAG 2.2. I'm very concerned about that approach. For several reasons, one
being that 2.2 is not a given.

<shawn> [some discussion about why there is resistance]

<shawn> Erich: I

<shawn> Erich: I'll do next comment as SC manager.

<shawn> Jim updated https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/76

update issue and the SC for viewing to say When a page can be printed,
essential information is printed with no loss of content or adapted text
properties. (Level AAA)

survey - folks were not looking at current version. and did not understand
the issue

jim added definitions

There are misunderstanding about what the SC covers. People were not
reviewing the current wording. The SC doesnot cover Page/paper Size, Font
Size, Zoom. Images not an issue with this proposed SC.

the people who opposed this before should be able to review.

img {max-width: 100%;}

https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/76

https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/76#issuecomment-324167545

if you put the adapted text in the rendered view, it prints. I think the
issue is that we dont want the page to break when printing

trackbot, end meeting
Summary of Action Items Summary of Resolutions [End of minutes]

-- 
Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator
Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired
1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756
voice 512.206.9315    fax: 512.206.9452 http://www.tsbvi.edu/
"We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964

Received on Thursday, 24 August 2017 16:22:58 UTC